Quote from: ciggiesnbeer on December 05, 2014, 05:30:35 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:24:01 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 05:14:57 PMPart of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea. Even though it's been explained about a hundred thousand times that such a reaction/rejection never took place?Didn't that rumour of the reaction/rejection come from McLaren himself though?From a media friend of his, I believe.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:24:01 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 05:14:57 PMPart of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea. Even though it's been explained about a hundred thousand times that such a reaction/rejection never took place?Didn't that rumour of the reaction/rejection come from McLaren himself though?
Quote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 05:14:57 PMPart of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea. Even though it's been explained about a hundred thousand times that such a reaction/rejection never took place?
Part of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:31:38 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on December 05, 2014, 05:30:35 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:24:01 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 05:14:57 PMPart of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea. Even though it's been explained about a hundred thousand times that such a reaction/rejection never took place?Didn't that rumour of the reaction/rejection come from McLaren himself though?From a media friend of his, I believe.Ah gotcha.
Quote from: ciggiesnbeer on December 05, 2014, 05:33:09 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:31:38 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on December 05, 2014, 05:30:35 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 05, 2014, 05:24:01 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 05:14:57 PMPart of me still thinks Lerner did it as "fuck you" to the fans after the public reaction/rejection of the Steve McLaren idea. Even though it's been explained about a hundred thousand times that such a reaction/rejection never took place?Didn't that rumour of the reaction/rejection come from McLaren himself though?From a media friend of his, I believe.Ah gotcha.Would you want to publicly admit you'd been turned down in favour of Alex McLeish?
Hated his season in charge tbh, there was no hope and hardly any decent games apart from Chelsea and Wolves away. Mind you it isn't a lot different now.I wish him well though. Think he's doing alright at Genk.
We never got hammered under Mcleish did we ? Certainly no embarrassing 0-4's or 1-4's at home or 8-0's !
Quote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 08:44:20 PMWe never got hammered under Mcleish did we ? Certainly no embarrassing 0-4's or 1-4's at home or 8-0's ! Until losing Dunne at the back we were reasonably solid under him. Of course scoring goals was the major issue. We also didn't help ourselves with giving away so many free-kicks around the edge of the box so often during Hutton's shit days, Collins and Warnock (who was utterly horrendous that season).Our gameplan last season and this has been essentially exactly the same as McLeish. Defend most of the game and try and nick a result. Go a goal up and hold it. A goal down and most times it's game over. I do think McLeish had the most horrendous injury hit of recent years though. Losing three key players long term/permanently in the course of month. Turning us from comfortable mid-table to probably another 2 games from relegation had the season been 40 games instead of 38. We were entirely reliant on Bent getting goals. Likewise Stan was still one of our top scorers that season when he got injured too.
Quote from: supertom on December 05, 2014, 09:07:16 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on December 05, 2014, 08:44:20 PMWe never got hammered under Mcleish did we ? Certainly no embarrassing 0-4's or 1-4's at home or 8-0's ! Until losing Dunne at the back we were reasonably solid under him. Of course scoring goals was the major issue. We also didn't help ourselves with giving away so many free-kicks around the edge of the box so often during Hutton's shit days, Collins and Warnock (who was utterly horrendous that season).Our gameplan last season and this has been essentially exactly the same as McLeish. Defend most of the game and try and nick a result. Go a goal up and hold it. A goal down and most times it's game over. I do think McLeish had the most horrendous injury hit of recent years though. Losing three key players long term/permanently in the course of month. Turning us from comfortable mid-table to probably another 2 games from relegation had the season been 40 games instead of 38. We were entirely reliant on Bent getting goals. Likewise Stan was still one of our top scorers that season when he got injured too.The lack of consistent competitiveness, the lack of excitement, beyond that of a plucky underdog wining against the odds. The lack of football.I'd say we've had at least 4 seasons of shite.
The Houllier season was equally as shite fir different reasons. We had some good players but the rot was evident. Wolves at home: hideous.