My youngest son is still at school! They are just building a sports centre on the playing fields so they can hire it out to the community!
My eldest will be attending a private school in the UK in September - not our first choice but missed the deadline for applyinmg for state schools. However, I 'nipped' back to the Uk last week for his induction day and the size of the playing field that they have was astonsihing. When I was at my comp we didn't even have one of our own. There really is a diminshing return on children's eductaion when it comes to sport. If you have the money the classrooms or smaller (i.e children to teacher ratio), they tend to be better equipped, and the playing fields available are also either shared, or non-existant.Maybe not for the discussion forum but it's a valid point that our success at international level is of course going to be questioned when less children have exposure to playing the game with proper facilities.
Quote from: Mister E on June 25, 2014, 05:56:51 PMYou should listen to Bryan's contribution here. It's controversial vis-a-vis England. The rest of it is interesting, too.Thanks for posting this, 'cuss.What does he say for those that cannot listen?
You should listen to Bryan's contribution here. It's controversial vis-a-vis England. The rest of it is interesting, too.Thanks for posting this, 'cuss.
Quote from: Simon Ward on June 26, 2014, 10:51:33 AMMy youngest son is still at school! They are just building a sports centre on the playing fields so they can hire it out to the community!My 2 kids are at an inner city primary school ( famous alumni include Ian Wright, Shaun Wright Philips and Maxi Priest) and there is no playing field, just a small concrete playground. The local secodndary which they will go to is the same. It reminds me of the recreation yard at Alcatraz.
Quote from: peter w on June 26, 2014, 08:54:21 AMMy eldest will be attending a private school in the UK in September - not our first choice but missed the deadline for applyinmg for state schools. However, I 'nipped' back to the Uk last week for his induction day and the size of the playing field that they have was astonsihing. When I was at my comp we didn't even have one of our own. There really is a diminshing return on children's eductaion when it comes to sport. If you have the money the classrooms or smaller (i.e children to teacher ratio), they tend to be better equipped, and the playing fields available are also either shared, or non-existant.Maybe not for the discussion forum but it's a valid point that our success at international level is of course going to be questioned when less children have exposure to playing the game with proper facilities.I read something the other day regarding the London Olympians statng that 41% of our Olympic athletes in 2012 came from private schools, i.e. 7% of the school-going population.I like the idea of a TV money levy to supplement spending on facilities/coaching provision in schools. It is what the PL would be doing anyway if there was any sense.
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on June 26, 2014, 12:09:51 PMQuote from: Simon Ward on June 26, 2014, 10:51:33 AMMy youngest son is still at school! They are just building a sports centre on the playing fields so they can hire it out to the community!My 2 kids are at an inner city primary school ( famous alumni include Ian Wright, Shaun Wright Philips and Maxi Priest) and there is no playing field, just a small concrete playground. The local secodndary which they will go to is the same. It reminds me of the recreation yard at Alcatraz. At least that means there's hope for a future generation of Tunnel Engineers and papier mache artists.
Quote from: tomd2103 on June 26, 2014, 12:15:08 AMHaving been there a couple of times, I'm still really not sure how a multi million pound facility down a country lane just outside Burton is helping the national game in any way. It opened at the end of 2012. I'm not sure what results you would expect to see from it at this point. It's not going to suddenly mean that the current Danny Wellbeck or Jordan Henderson now play like Angel Di Maria and Toni Kroos, but it might mean that current eight year olds turn into better players than Danny Wellbeck and Jordan Henderson.It could also turn into a giant, irrelevent white elephant - but I don't think the first 18 months of it's existence is the time to judge it.
Having been there a couple of times, I'm still really not sure how a multi million pound facility down a country lane just outside Burton is helping the national game in any way.
Quote from: Dave on June 26, 2014, 11:24:34 AMQuote from: tomd2103 on June 26, 2014, 12:15:08 AMHaving been there a couple of times, I'm still really not sure how a multi million pound facility down a country lane just outside Burton is helping the national game in any way. It opened at the end of 2012. I'm not sure what results you would expect to see from it at this point. It's not going to suddenly mean that the current Danny Wellbeck or Jordan Henderson now play like Angel Di Maria and Toni Kroos, but it might mean that current eight year olds turn into better players than Danny Wellbeck and Jordan Henderson.It could also turn into a giant, irrelevent white elephant - but I don't think the first 18 months of it's existence is the time to judge it.Nobody's expecting instant results, but it was heralded as something that was going to change the game in this country. I just can't see how it will. It really is in the middle of nowhere and I just can't see how many of the eight year olds you mention are going to be able to access it. There are already mutterings that some in the England set up think it is too far from Wembley.
Not wishing to quote a lengthy post when I only want to take issue with one part of it, but the FA and the Premier League are two separate entities. The FA is the game's governing body in England and ostensibly control all leagues in the same way. The Premier League is owned and controlled by its member clubs.