Not sure I wholly agree with the part of the analysis which suggested vulnerability for being a counter attacking team.
I don't have the exact figures to hand, but I vaguely remember us being (FWIW) a top half team based on half time scores. This is at odds with this guy's suggestion that we conceded because we were chasing the game.
I think a clearer picture was that because we were weak as a defensive unit we went for more or less all-out attack.