collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Paul the Pauper  (Read 10922 times)

Offline Ron Manager

  • Member
  • Posts: 5710
  • Location: Staffordshire
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Paul the Pauper
« on: April 19, 2013, 04:28:55 PM »
It appears that our CEO a Mr Paul Faulkner took home a salary of £256,000 last year. Meanwhile up the road at Molineux Wolves CEO a Mr Jez Moxey took home...wait for it....£1.2mil!

I find that quite astonishing.

Comments gentlemen.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 29979
  • Location: Down to Worthing...and work there
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2013, 04:30:59 PM »
Is he any relation to Paul the Villan?

Offline john in oz

  • Member
  • Posts: 205
  • Location: australia
  • GM : Jun, 2012
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2013, 04:34:30 PM »
i would ask for a tansfer to wolves

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61562
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2013, 04:39:43 PM »
Niall Quinn got £2.4 million.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2013, 04:41:34 PM »
Niall Quinn got £2.4 million.

I was staggered by that, think it includes a £2 million pay off.

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21035
  • Location: Lost In The Supermarket
  • GM : PCM
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2013, 04:43:56 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2013, 04:52:26 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

You mean if he'd performed well he'd have got more?

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33428
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2013, 04:58:42 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well.  I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2013, 05:13:31 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well.  I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.

That has completely lost me!

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15508
  • GM : 25.02.2025
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2013, 05:41:02 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well.  I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.

Pardon?

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23206
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2013, 07:18:03 PM »
Is he any relation to Paul the Villan?

I'd settle to be short, fat and ginger for that salary. :D

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85449
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2013, 07:45:13 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well.  I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.

Years of appalling losses, falling turnover, the appointment of a manager like McLeish.....how exactly is he doing well.  No wonder he doesn't earn very much.

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 41986
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2013, 08:02:55 PM »
Perhaps he's paid for performance? 

5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well.  I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.

Years of appalling losses, falling turnover, the appointment of a manager like McLeish.....how exactly is he doing well. 
I suppose one could say if "Jez" Moxey took home five times as much to potentially oversee consecutive relegations the we're getting value for money. Comparatively speaking only, of course.

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23206
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2013, 08:04:06 PM »
Didn't I read somewhere that revenue coming in from abroad was at it's highest ever?

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 41986
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Paul the Pauper
« Reply #14 on: April 19, 2013, 08:06:34 PM »
Didn't I read somewhere that revenue coming in from abroad was at it's highest ever?
I'd be amazed if it weren't. But how much of that is going to be overseas TV revenue organised on behalf of the Premier League rather than anything to do with whoever our Chief Executive happens to be though?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal