Baker was our main man for most of the first half. McLeish rated him highly and has to be given credit for the way he got to how he played today.
I'm a bit curious myself on this one, DC5! In what way did McLeish play such a big role in Bakers development? I'd guess that as a fine defender himself he might have seen his potential?
Quote from: citizenDJ on December 15, 2012, 11:51:11 PMI'm a bit curious myself on this one, DC5! In what way did McLeish play such a big role in Bakers development? I'd guess that as a fine defender himself he might have seen his potential?By sending him out on loan, and then playing him a handful of times, when Dunne got injured and he had no other options.I am happy to give McLeish credit when he deserves it (Holman, for example, on a Bosman), but really, it's tenuous in the extreme to paint him as some kind of influential factor in Baker's development.Houllier played Baker five times. McLeish then next used him a year after his last appearance for us.
DC5 and TSM = Chris Smith and DOL
It's like watching Gary Cahill all over again. All we need now is an overhead kicked goal in front of the Holte and we're there.
Quote from: russon on December 16, 2012, 07:13:16 AMIt's like watching Gary Cahill all over again. All we need now is an overhead kicked goal in front of the Holte and we're there.Let's just hope the manager doesn't go mental and give him away for next to nothing this time. Somehow, I can't see it happening.