Quote from: paul_e on September 17, 2012, 09:57:48 AMThe only bit I disagree with is with Given being dropped for poor performance, I just don't think that's the case and I think it belittles the quality of the performances from Guzan since. Guzan got a start int he cup and played well enough to earn the place for the Newcastle game. He then played superbly and has now followed it up with another superb performance. The emphasis has got to be on if you play well enough you'll get game time, not if you play badly you get dropped.I know it's not easy to apply that for goalkeepers who tend to only get the odd chance to impress when they're out of the team but Guzan left before because previous managers were waiting for the current keeper to make enough mistakes to be dropped, which totally ignores his form. Everyone on here agrees that Guzan should have stayed in the team last season but because Given hadn't played badly enough to lose his spot he got it back as soon as he was fit.Sorry mate - i disagree completely. Guzan did very little in the Tranmere game to justify him staying in - it was more about a poor EC for Ireland followed by at least two of the goals against Everton were totally Givens faultSomeone somewhere mention a very good point and that it maybe none of us know how badly the death of his best mate (Speed) has effected himEither way Guzan was resigned on the basis that if he gets his chance and does well he stays in - well Bradders the shirt is your to lose because Saturday was as a complete a Goalkeepers performance as i have seen for many years - it had everything Great reaction saves, superb domination of area, crossing interception and vocal command of back 4As i said unless Guzan fucks up Given will get splinters for a while
The only bit I disagree with is with Given being dropped for poor performance, I just don't think that's the case and I think it belittles the quality of the performances from Guzan since. Guzan got a start int he cup and played well enough to earn the place for the Newcastle game. He then played superbly and has now followed it up with another superb performance. The emphasis has got to be on if you play well enough you'll get game time, not if you play badly you get dropped.I know it's not easy to apply that for goalkeepers who tend to only get the odd chance to impress when they're out of the team but Guzan left before because previous managers were waiting for the current keeper to make enough mistakes to be dropped, which totally ignores his form. Everyone on here agrees that Guzan should have stayed in the team last season but because Given hadn't played badly enough to lose his spot he got it back as soon as he was fit.
Hookey - the problem is I completely disagree with the sentiment of "put a stake in the ground for any player to understand their place can be lost with poor performances".The stake it puts in the ground is, "if you're given a chance and you take it you'll be rewarded".I want people losing their place because the guy behind them is chomping at the bit, not because they've made mistakes.I'm not saying Given deserved to keep his spot, I'd have dropped him last season and he's gone backwards since, I'm saying the message he sends is, and should be, "if you earn your spot you keep it unless someone else does more to earn it", rather than "you'll keep you're spot until you fuck up".As a non-starter the first shows that training hard and putting in the effort when you come off the bench, etc will be rewarded, the latter says no matter how well you do you stay where you are until that guy proves he shouldn't be there. The latter approach is the more traditional one in the UK and is a key reason why we don't see as many kids coming through at premier league clubs, stick with a trusted if limited player rather than run the risk of picking an untried youngster.
What are Villa's relegation odds after Saturday? I know they shortened after the Newcastle game.
wasnt the Everton keeper poor last night, i think he could take some blame for both Newky goals last night
I just read that Sunderland have managed a grand total of five shots on goal from their three league matches so far this season.That's the MON way. I was reading one of their forums today, and there was much moaning about sitting back and trying to play on the counter attack at home, and having no Plan B. A few of the posters were pointing this out, but most of them were calling them "knee jerkers" and moaners.It was just like this place a few years ago.It does, though, make you think that we're really fighting to throw of the bad habits of four years or more. It won't happen in the space of a few matches.
I agree, he was trying to do that, at least. Whether he was succeeding is another question, but there's no doubt we took a 12 month trip in the opposite direction under McLeish last season.That's the thing that baffled me most about the appointment. It wasn't his shit record, but the fact that you appoint a manager like Houllier, who then starts moving things into the modern age, then you appoint someone who is a poster boy for outmoded, outdated, and frankly horrible 1980s style English football.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 19, 2012, 07:15:11 PMI agree, he was trying to do that, at least. Whether he was succeeding is another question, but there's no doubt we took a 12 month trip in the opposite direction under McLeish last season.That's the thing that baffled me most about the appointment. It wasn't his shit record, but the fact that you appoint a manager like Houllier, who then starts moving things into the modern age, then you appoint someone who is a poster boy for outmoded, outdated, and frankly horrible 1980s style English football.No argument here. I doubt we'll ever find out the real thinking (or lack thereof) behind it.