Quote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 07:01:13 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on April 21, 2012, 06:54:19 PMQuote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 06:49:55 PMWe can post up the stats til we're blue in the face but Randy et al clearly could not give a crap They weren't bothered about the stats when they employed him , let's face itI can't believe he can think the season's going ok when you see statistics like that.I am absolutely convinced they think he's doing a job.I'm also convinced we're going down,we are atrociousThe fact the club approached him shows no one in the upper echelons of the club knows anything about football. As such, if he can talk the talk, the manager is probably convincing RL & PF that he is doing a good job.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on April 21, 2012, 06:54:19 PMQuote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 06:49:55 PMWe can post up the stats til we're blue in the face but Randy et al clearly could not give a crap They weren't bothered about the stats when they employed him , let's face itI can't believe he can think the season's going ok when you see statistics like that.I am absolutely convinced they think he's doing a job.I'm also convinced we're going down,we are atrocious
Quote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 06:49:55 PMWe can post up the stats til we're blue in the face but Randy et al clearly could not give a crap They weren't bothered about the stats when they employed him , let's face itI can't believe he can think the season's going ok when you see statistics like that.
We can post up the stats til we're blue in the face but Randy et al clearly could not give a crap They weren't bothered about the stats when they employed him , let's face it
Quote from: Vanilla on April 21, 2012, 07:03:58 PMQuote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 07:01:13 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on April 21, 2012, 06:54:19 PMQuote from: ZoggyAlways on April 21, 2012, 06:49:55 PMWe can post up the stats til we're blue in the face but Randy et al clearly could not give a crap They weren't bothered about the stats when they employed him , let's face itI can't believe he can think the season's going ok when you see statistics like that.I am absolutely convinced they think he's doing a job.I'm also convinced we're going down,we are atrociousThe fact the club approached him shows no one in the upper echelons of the club knows anything about football. As such, if he can talk the talk, the manager is probably convincing RL & PF that he is doing a good job.If you remember Randy/Faulkner said they took plenty of advice before appointing the present manager....from whom!!
Embarrassing is the word that sums it up. Also there's been no progression or sign that we're going to improve, we've actually got worse.
I still stand by the belief that no one can possibly turn the statistics above, along with a number of others, into anything resembling a mediocre season let alone a good one. Given that I can't imagine the board aren't thinking either he needs backing to replace young, downing, etc or are thinking they need a new manager.I guess the underlying decision is going to have to be based on how much faith the board have in the squad and youth system. Backing McLeish suggests they think the squad are no better than a relegation fight. Given it's still a very expensively assembled squad I don't see how they can possibly think that.
I was going to post something similar, but I'm struggling with tables - perhaps someone could re-post this for me?Here is our performance over the last twenty years. Although things could obviously change if McLeish manages to magic a win from somewhere, we are on course for our lowest points total, currently having the lowest points per game for that period. Season Pos Manager G W D L F A GD P P/G11/12 15 McLeish 34 7 15 12 35 48 -13 36 1.0610/11 9 Houllier 38 12 12 14 48 59 -11 48 1.2609/10 6 O’Neill 38 17 13 8 52 39 +13 64 1.6808/09 6 O’Neill 38 17 11 10 54 48 +6 62 1.6307/08 6 O’Neill 38 16 12 10 71 51 +20 60 1.5906/07 11 O’Neill 38 11 17 10 43 41 +2 50 1.3205/06 16 O’Leary 38 10 12 16 42 55 -13 42 1.1104/05 10 O’Leary 38 12 11 15 45 52 -7 47 1.2403/04 6 O’Leary 38 15 11 12 48 44 +4 56 1.4702/03 16 Taylor 38 12 9 17 42 47 -5 45 1.1801/02 8 Gregory/ Taylor 38 12 14 12 46 47 -1 50 1.3200/01 8 Gregory 38 13 15 10 46 43 +3 54 1.4299/00 6 Gregory 38 15 13 10 46 35 +11 58 1.5398/99 6 Gregory 38 15 10 13 51 46 +5 55 1.4597/98 7 Little/ Gregory 38 17 6 15 49 48 +1 57 1.596/97 5 Little 38 17 10 11 47 34 +13 61 1.6195/96 4 Little 38 18 9 11 52 35 +17 63 1.6694/95 18 Atkinson/ Little 42 11 15 16 51 56 -5 48 1.1493/94 10 Atkinson 42 15 12 15 46 50 -4 57 1.3692/93 2 Atkinson 42 21 11 10 57 40 17 74 1.76