Some ridiculous opinions on here already gents, well done. It's near damn impossible to win matches without flair players. He was never brought here to be a box to box mf, he was brought here to win us games. Finally he has calmed down his lifestyle, is concentrating on family and career and by our own managers admission is putting in a shift for the team every week and people are saying lets sell him for 5m and replace him with another hard working sidwell. Brilliant. Here's an idea mr Faulkner; let's release a statement saying we are looking to build our squad around people like Ireland and under no circumstances are our star players for sale. Or alternatively we can move him on like we have with Barry, young, Milner, downing. Am I going mad?
Quote from: ktvillan on March 21, 2012, 09:55:03 AMI have to say whoever agreed to 70k a week for him (can we blame MON for this one?) wants fucking shooting.He took a pay cut to join us.
I have to say whoever agreed to 70k a week for him (can we blame MON for this one?) wants fucking shooting.
Quote from: John M'Zog on March 21, 2012, 09:58:05 AMQuote from: ktvillan on March 21, 2012, 09:55:03 AMI have to say whoever agreed to 70k a week for him (can we blame MON for this one?) wants fucking shooting.He took a pay cut to join us.Not really relevant, though, is it?We still paid him a vast sum of money to do shit all for a long time. Now he's finally starting to deliver, unless there is an utterly compelling financial reason to do so, selling him would be daft - especially if we then replaced him with a flairless grafter like Guthrie.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on March 21, 2012, 10:35:49 AMQuote from: John M'Zog on March 21, 2012, 09:58:05 AMQuote from: ktvillan on March 21, 2012, 09:55:03 AMI have to say whoever agreed to 70k a week for him (can we blame MON for this one?) wants fucking shooting.He took a pay cut to join us.Not really relevant, though, is it?We still paid him a vast sum of money to do shit all for a long time. Now he's finally starting to deliver, unless there is an utterly compelling financial reason to do so, selling him would be daft - especially if we then replaced him with a flairless grafter like Guthrie.It is relevant to the argument of whether we're paying him too much or just paying him the going rate.But I agree about not selling him. He's starting to show what he can do so lets keep him.
No-one will pay Heskey £60k a week.
Not sure I agree with that, given that he came from a club where stupid wages are the norm (and were before the current lot rolled up, even).If we're paying Heskey 65k a week and we offload him somewhere else who pay him 60k, are they paying the going rate, or are both clubs paying him well over the top?
Quote from: N'ZMAV on March 21, 2012, 11:30:40 AMNo-one will pay Heskey £60k a week.I know. It's just an example to show how a player going from one overpaid contract to another doesn't mean it's the going rate, it can mean they're both paying way over the top.
Here's an idea mr Faulkner; let's release a statement saying we are looking to build our squad around people like Ireland and under no circumstances are our star players for sale. Or alternatively we can move him on like we have with Barry, young, Milner, downing.