Quote from: PeterWithe on February 09, 2012, 07:34:28 AMIts not unconnected. His appointment has led to fewer people coming through the gates and revenue dropping. If we're going to point the finger though I think Faulkner is a better target, being on this list was more important to him than anything else seemingly.Do you really think it's had any 'significant' impact? I think crowds would have been down this season whoever got the job due to selling of players and the wider recession, I think it's difficult to make a case for placing much of it at the door of McLeish.
Its not unconnected. His appointment has led to fewer people coming through the gates and revenue dropping. If we're going to point the finger though I think Faulkner is a better target, being on this list was more important to him than anything else seemingly.
Quote from: The Villa Werewolf on February 09, 2012, 07:14:17 AMDoes that mean McLeish can be sacked now?Can't really blame McLeish for this
Does that mean McLeish can be sacked now?
It was always slightly bizarre to state this as a goal and then do as much as humanly possible to stifle the flow of income by pissing off the paying customers.
Actually, with profits from player sales and dramatically increased commercial income from the Genting and Macron deals I expect the next year or two turnover figures to be a lot better.
I don't think he's anywhere near as disliked as DOL was in his last season. And I'd say Houllier after the Anfield thing was more disliked too.