Well, he did substitute a LB for a striker, which is a very attacking move, even if he could have done it earlier.
Clark wouldn't be the most attacking of LBs, but solid defensively and comfortable on the ball, which would be a big improvement from Warnock right now. Not a longterm solution, but maybe a short term answer.
What I dont like about AMC . Its gets to 65/70 minutes , you are playing a leggy poor Everton side without their two main CB's and do you go for the kill . No , you just make sure you dont lose the game.
Quote from: John M'Zog on January 16, 2012, 02:31:23 PMClark wouldn't be the most attacking of LBs, but solid defensively and comfortable on the ball, which would be a big improvement from Warnock right now. Not a longterm solution, but maybe a short term answer. I believe the same is to be said for Eric Lichaj in for Hutton, he's solid but may offer less going forward (or would he what has Hutton actually done? except should of given away 7/8 penalty’s since arriving and provided poor crosses)
Maybe we should play three centre-backs and use attacking players as wing backs given that we've no decent full backs.
Another thing he's avoided is the Bent/Gabby conundrum. We just tend not to play well with both of them in the team but he's not made the obvious call to drop one of them in order to make the team play better. I'm not knocking him too much for it as I'm not sure which one I'd choose but it's definitely a call he's avoided.