Quote from: Irish villain on December 12, 2011, 09:38:24 PMQuote from: Vanilla on December 12, 2011, 02:39:35 PMQuote from: Hookeysmith on December 12, 2011, 11:10:18 AMPoor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying somethingSounds like Houllier situation last season, a period which many are now looking back on with a certain fondness. I don't look back on that with any fondness. Houllier had better players at his disposal than McLeish and the board backed him with cash in January. McLeish has been asked to work on a shoestring and has lost the likes of Ashley young, Luke Young and Dirty D (not saying Dirty D was a great player, but still, the fact that we lost two 'big players' and didn't replace both reduced Mcleish's prospects).On balance, Mcleish has done a better job than Houllier.It's too early to make that call. Comparing the two home performances to ManUre, this season and last, they were worlds apart (I do acknowledge Young and Downing had great games in that match last season but we also had more inexperienced players on show that day than this season). McLeish had the easier fixtures at the start too.
Quote from: Vanilla on December 12, 2011, 02:39:35 PMQuote from: Hookeysmith on December 12, 2011, 11:10:18 AMPoor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying somethingSounds like Houllier situation last season, a period which many are now looking back on with a certain fondness. I don't look back on that with any fondness. Houllier had better players at his disposal than McLeish and the board backed him with cash in January. McLeish has been asked to work on a shoestring and has lost the likes of Ashley young, Luke Young and Dirty D (not saying Dirty D was a great player, but still, the fact that we lost two 'big players' and didn't replace both reduced Mcleish's prospects).On balance, Mcleish has done a better job than Houllier.
Quote from: Hookeysmith on December 12, 2011, 11:10:18 AMPoor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying somethingSounds like Houllier situation last season, a period which many are now looking back on with a certain fondness.
Poor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying something
I dont get this I don't like the training method bollocks, I hate at work that they are constantly making me do stuff I don't want to do but they pay my wages, players would do well to remember this and realise they are bloody lucky to do what they do.
Martin Jol is a fine coach a lot better that our man. He is doing a good job at Fulham. He is working with a smaller budget that us and arguably lesser players. Their win v Liverpool was good and they were unlucky against Swansea. So we didn't dodge a bullett in fact the bullett is embedded in our head with the choice Randy has made.
Yes they are below us and so they should be. We are a much bigger club. Yes we have lost some players but our current players are better than Fulham's.Pound for pound Jol is doing better than McLeish.
Quote from: aftab235 on December 13, 2011, 11:30:28 AMYes they are below us and so they should be. We are a much bigger club. Yes we have lost some players but our current players are better than Fulham's.Pound for pound Jol is doing better than McLeish.Such comparisons are hard to make, unless it's the lower spending club above the bigger spending one. Where did they finish last season? We've gone backwards player wise, yet (so far at least) maintained the same league position.
Quote from: John M'Zog on December 13, 2011, 11:33:39 AMQuote from: aftab235 on December 13, 2011, 11:30:28 AMYes they are below us and so they should be. We are a much bigger club. Yes we have lost some players but our current players are better than Fulham's.Pound for pound Jol is doing better than McLeish.Such comparisons are hard to make, unless it's the lower spending club above the bigger spending one. Where did they finish last season? We've gone backwards player wise, yet (so far at least) maintained the same league position. Below us last season. Any coach keeping Fulham in the PL deserves credit based on their resources. They are not comprable to us and that is why I think both Hughes and Jol would have been a better choice for us than Eck.