Quote from: PeterWithe on December 12, 2011, 11:38:53 AMWe may have dodged it but the next out the barrel hit us firmly between the eyes.We're like that scene in Saving Private Ryan, were the soldier takes a bullet in the helmet, takes off the helmet to look at it whilst thanking his lucky stars & then gets shot right between the eyes.
We may have dodged it but the next out the barrel hit us firmly between the eyes.
Fulham are essentially the same squad of players that they've been for the past 2-3 seasons, so he can't claim much credit for the way they play.
Quote from: Bren'd on December 12, 2011, 11:47:50 AMPoor displays? They looked half decent to me against Liverpool. Anyway, what is it with modern day footballers and "training methods" they don't appear to like? We had it last season with our lot apparently not liking GH's methods when it was clear the fitness of some of our players wasn't up to scratch. The fitness thing has been there for a few years now. I remember John Terry saying that Chelsea waited for the 60th minute mark against us as they knew we'd get tired.
Poor displays? They looked half decent to me against Liverpool. Anyway, what is it with modern day footballers and "training methods" they don't appear to like? We had it last season with our lot apparently not liking GH's methods when it was clear the fitness of some of our players wasn't up to scratch.
Quote from: Chris Smith on December 12, 2011, 11:56:39 AMFulham are essentially the same squad of players that they've been for the past 2-3 seasons, so he can't claim much credit for the way they play. Very true. In the same way McLeish can't take too much of the blame for the way we play.
Next up, Owen Coyle - did we dodge a bullet?
Poor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying something
Quote from: Chris Smith on December 12, 2011, 11:19:44 AMNext up, Owen Coyle - did we dodge a bullet? I never really got the love-in for him last season. He had Bolton around the top six - eight for a few months, then they finished 14th.Same as the risible Sunderland fans talking about "Bent leaving a top six club", based on them being in the top six in January.The other week I saw in one of the papers some utter pap about Alan Pardew having a good shout to be the next England manager. Ridiculous.
Quote from: Warren Aspinall on December 12, 2011, 12:10:08 PMQuote from: Bren'd on December 12, 2011, 11:47:50 AMPoor displays? They looked half decent to me against Liverpool. Anyway, what is it with modern day footballers and "training methods" they don't appear to like? We had it last season with our lot apparently not liking GH's methods when it was clear the fitness of some of our players wasn't up to scratch. The fitness thing has been there for a few years now. I remember John Terry saying that Chelsea waited for the 60th minute mark against us as they knew we'd get tired.I remember that, then I remembered that we had a good record against them and recalled him having a tantrum kicking the post after conceding at VP and thought "what a lying twat".
Quote from: Hookeysmith on December 12, 2011, 11:10:18 AMPoor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying somethingSounds like Houllier situation last season, a period which many are now looking back on with a certain fondness.
It's possible Jol is suffering a bit of Dunne/Collins syndrome, trying to apply continental methods to players with a very British mentality who want to stay in the technique and fitness free comfort zone they've enjoyed under British bosses. I rate him as a manager and I think Fulham will do okay eventually.
Quote from: Vanilla on December 12, 2011, 02:39:35 PMQuote from: Hookeysmith on December 12, 2011, 11:10:18 AMPoor displays this yearSenior players being vocal about training methods and coachingHe was fancied highly by a few on hereI actually think he is worse than Ginge - and thats saying somethingSounds like Houllier situation last season, a period which many are now looking back on with a certain fondness. I don't look back on that with any fondness. Houllier had better players at his disposal than McLeish and the board backed him with cash in January. McLeish has been asked to work on a shoestring and has lost the likes of Ashley young, Luke Young and Dirty D (not saying Dirty D was a great player, but still, the fact that we lost two 'big players' and didn't replace both reduced Mcleish's prospects).On balance, Mcleish has done a better job than Houllier.