This has just flashed up on the BBC.............0932 FOOTBALL: Chief executive Paul Faulkner believes Aston Villa should be challenging for a European spot this season. "I think Europe sits there as a goal and this year that would be our goal. That's what we want to try and achieve," said Faulkner. "It's not easy but I believe it's doo-able this year. We've got a lot of ambition."Oh dear...........
Quote from: SoccerHQ on November 25, 2011, 10:07:21 AMQuote from: TheZogman on November 24, 2011, 04:31:26 PMQuote from: Can Bent Be Bettered!?!? on November 24, 2011, 04:24:08 PMQuote from: KevinGage on November 24, 2011, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.And Van Der Vaarts wages probably amount to more than all of ours.Not sure. I think his wages are not much different from Heskey's.And there in a nutshell is why Spurs have played champions league football in the last 2 years and are looking good again for it and we haven't and aren't.If anything shows the difference in approach, it is the fact that we were paying Steve Sidwell twice as much as Spurs were paying Luka Modric.
Quote from: TheZogman on November 24, 2011, 04:31:26 PMQuote from: Can Bent Be Bettered!?!? on November 24, 2011, 04:24:08 PMQuote from: KevinGage on November 24, 2011, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.And Van Der Vaarts wages probably amount to more than all of ours.Not sure. I think his wages are not much different from Heskey's.And there in a nutshell is why Spurs have played champions league football in the last 2 years and are looking good again for it and we haven't and aren't.
Quote from: Can Bent Be Bettered!?!? on November 24, 2011, 04:24:08 PMQuote from: KevinGage on November 24, 2011, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.And Van Der Vaarts wages probably amount to more than all of ours.Not sure. I think his wages are not much different from Heskey's.
Quote from: KevinGage on November 24, 2011, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.And Van Der Vaarts wages probably amount to more than all of ours.
Quote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.
Quote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than Spurs
Still, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on November 25, 2011, 10:29:27 AMQuote from: SoccerHQ on November 25, 2011, 10:07:21 AMQuote from: TheZogman on November 24, 2011, 04:31:26 PMQuote from: Can Bent Be Bettered!?!? on November 24, 2011, 04:24:08 PMQuote from: KevinGage on November 24, 2011, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: nigel on November 24, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Risso on November 24, 2011, 02:01:33 PMStill, had to laugh at the "Villa's wage bill was bigger than Spurs'" bit, maybe Tom is an H&V reader?!It was. In the last year or 2 of MO'N reign we had a bigger wage bill than SpursNevermind that ancient history. The side Tottingham put out on Monday cost less than ours. Y'know, that side who are in a diffferent league to us now, so good that we can only hope to go there and keep the score down etc.And Van Der Vaarts wages probably amount to more than all of ours.Not sure. I think his wages are not much different from Heskey's.And there in a nutshell is why Spurs have played champions league football in the last 2 years and are looking good again for it and we haven't and aren't.If anything shows the difference in approach, it is the fact that we were paying Steve Sidwell twice as much as Spurs were paying Luka Modric.I think Levy has to take some credit as well as Redknapp. It shows the advantages of having a chairman who knows his arse from his elbow when it comes to football, budgeting, and contract negotiation.
Quote from: steffo on November 25, 2011, 10:14:57 AMThis has just flashed up on the BBC.............0932 FOOTBALL: Chief executive Paul Faulkner believes Aston Villa should be challenging for a European spot this season. "I think Europe sits there as a goal and this year that would be our goal. That's what we want to try and achieve," said Faulkner. "It's not easy but I believe it's doo-able this year. We've got a lot of ambition."Oh dear...........To be fair,Imagine the reaction if he'd said we had no chance of challenging for a European spot this year because we've got no ambition
If O'Neill had left a year or two earlier, imagine the reaction if we'd appointed 'Appy 'Arry? Spurs board deserve credit for that.
I thought it was a good interview.
I'm not sure where this myth of frugal Spurs came from, they've spent far more on their squad than we have. I did some sums a year or two back on comparative cost in transfer fees of the two squads and theirs was almost twice as much. We've hardly pushed the boat out since so I can't imagine it has altered much.