Well yeh that's a big point about today, the result may well have been different if it weren't for a error, but there's nothing you can do about it.
Quote from: bilsim on October 22, 2011, 05:11:04 PMWell yeh that's a big point about today, the result may well have been different if it weren't for a error, but there's nothing you can do about it. Well, yeah, that's the whole point of the post. Is there a way that a team can be compensated for a decision that is subsequently adjudged to be wrong by the games governing body? I know there is nothing we can do about it NOW but is there a way we can avoid such situations in the future? (Other than sacking Phil Dowd)
Quote from: Holtn'derinthesky on October 22, 2011, 05:22:33 PMQuote from: bilsim on October 22, 2011, 05:11:04 PMWell yeh that's a big point about today, the result may well have been different if it weren't for a error, but there's nothing you can do about it. I don't get the relevance of who's decision it was. IF the card is rescinded then it doesn't matter who called it, the point still stands does it not? Well, yeah, that's the whole point of the post. Is there a way that a team can be compensated for a decision that is subsequently adjudged to be wrong by the games governing body? I know there is nothing we can do about it NOW but is there a way we can avoid such situations in the future? (Other than sacking Phil Dowd)But wasnt it the linesmans decision? (don`t know his name - lets just call him c*nt)
Quote from: bilsim on October 22, 2011, 05:11:04 PMWell yeh that's a big point about today, the result may well have been different if it weren't for a error, but there's nothing you can do about it. I don't get the relevance of who's decision it was. IF the card is rescinded then it doesn't matter who called it, the point still stands does it not? Well, yeah, that's the whole point of the post. Is there a way that a team can be compensated for a decision that is subsequently adjudged to be wrong by the games governing body? I know there is nothing we can do about it NOW but is there a way we can avoid such situations in the future? (Other than sacking Phil Dowd)
If a player is sent off and the red card is then rescinded retrospectively how on earth can the result of the match stand? The officials have mad an horrendous error that will surely be overturned by the FA but what good is it going to do us? Is it time for the rules to be changed and if so, how?
Quote from: Holtn'derinthesky on October 22, 2011, 05:22:33 PMQuote from: bilsim on October 22, 2011, 05:11:04 PMWell yeh that's a big point about today, the result may well have been different if it weren't for a error, but there's nothing you can do about it. Well, yeah, that's the whole point of the post. Is there a way that a team can be compensated for a decision that is subsequently adjudged to be wrong by the games governing body? I know there is nothing we can do about it NOW but is there a way we can avoid such situations in the future? (Other than sacking Phil Dowd)But wasnt it the linesmans decision? (don`t know his name - lets just call him c*nt)
Sorry guys but the decision was spot on ...... sat in Trinity Rd roughly in line with edge of area and it was clear that Herd made an attempted stamp in playerLinesman saw it flagged penalty and sending off ....not Dowds fault this time and no I cant stand the guyWe are quick enough to complain when things go against us but this one was correct
Quote from: Leicester_Villian on October 22, 2011, 06:08:19 PMSorry guys but the decision was spot on ...... sat in Trinity Rd roughly in line with edge of area and it was clear that Herd made an attempted stamp in playerLinesman saw it flagged penalty and sending off ....not Dowds fault this time and no I cant stand the guyWe are quick enough to complain when things go against us but this one was correctAny idea why there was absolutely no reaction from Olsson then?
Herd should have said his name was Vidic.Fat fucking c*** Dowd.