This is what happens when you pay the workforce more than the manager - other than in sales (where pay is based upon performance - performance related pay if you will) what other industry pays the the gaffer less than "his staff/team"No wonder there is no respect - they get paid £50k per week no matter how they perform..... still its a short career and all that sh**
Quote from: villa `cross the mersey on September 24, 2011, 10:05:31 AMThis is what happens when you pay the workforce more than the manager - other than in sales (where pay is based upon performance - performance related pay if you will) what other industry pays the the gaffer less than "his staff/team"No wonder there is no respect - they get paid £50k per week no matter how they perform..... still its a short career and all that sh**Respect is an interesting concept. What respect for Aston Villa did GH show at Anfield last season? In most circumstances it is something you earn, I don't think he felt he needed to bother as he was too good for a team he viewed as being lucky to have him. What was his phrase on being appointed about mid-table?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 23, 2011, 10:49:48 PMHe obviously wasn't alienated enough to ask for a move or turn down his wages. A transfer request's one thing, and I agree with you on that. But who the hell in human history has ever requested that they stop being paid their wages?John Elway and that bearded Roma player, but that wasn't really Luke Young's relationship with Villa was it?
He obviously wasn't alienated enough to ask for a move or turn down his wages.
I think Young is wrong to criticize Houllier and by clear inference the club who employed them both. Young did just what Downing did and many more before them, he used Villa as a soft touch, a cushy billet, an easy ride while he drew his prodigious wages and sat on the back of the tandem with his feet on the handlebars.I have tried to give credit where it is due as far as McLeish is concerned and have been genuinely pleased by his performance with the media. However, looking at this stereotypical Young outburst I think he was wrong to regard the past (both under Houllier and O'Neill) as done and done with. It may have been only media talk to say the slate is wiped clean but either the slate is wiped clean and McLeish ignores the way players have behaved in the past he is a fool or if the slate is not wiped clean and he has got his beady eye on the malingerers it is disingenuous (okay, bullshit) to trumpet to the world that the past is forgotten.If you take over a management job in any field your staff come with form - this one throws a million sickies, that one drops her drawers in the stationery cupboard, that one said her grannie had died while all the time she was leading the local boxercise classes - and you make plans accordingly.I am firmly in the school of thought that Dunne, Collins, Warnock and Ireland are still very much potential trouble makers. If your dog has bitten the postman there is every chance, once the bruises go down, that he will bite the milkman.If McLeish is to stamp an acceptable style on the performance and behaviour of Villa players he has to think long and hard before doing things like chucking out Makoun but giving Ireland yet more rope. It smacks of favouritism which is particularly dangerous when one of those being seen as a favourite has done nothing whatsoever to deserve it. Ireland is doing just what Luke Young did and using Villa as a nursing home.