On his day (pre-MON tinkering) he's easily a better centre half than either Collins or Dunne. He's also not a git like the other two.
Quote from: gregnash on July 04, 2011, 11:10:47 AMOn his day (pre-MON tinkering) he's easily a better centre half than either Collins or Dunne. He's also not a git like the other two.No, just not true.He'd a decent old fashioned blocker but the other two can pass the ball where he appears to have triangular feet. He did a good job as a right back where he also acted as a third centre back for set pieces but he's just one of your causes to continue your tedious anti O'Neill campaign so you have to pretend he's better than he is.That said I'm pleased he's staying because otherwise we'd have to buy a replacement.
Quote from: Chris Smith on July 04, 2011, 11:17:06 AMQuote from: gregnash on July 04, 2011, 11:10:47 AMOn his day (pre-MON tinkering) he's easily a better centre half than either Collins or Dunne. He's also not a git like the other two.No, just not true.He'd a decent old fashioned blocker but the other two can pass the ball where he appears to have triangular feet. He did a good job as a right back where he also acted as a third centre back for set pieces but he's just one of your causes to continue your tedious anti O'Neill campaign so you have to pretend he's better than he is.That said I'm pleased he's staying because otherwise we'd have to buy a replacement.bollocks. As a right-back he was completely utterly average, but was a victim of one of MON's ego trips. If you want an average right-back then buy one instead of forking out a fortune on a good centre half and turning him into one.
nice changing of the subject there, but you know i'm right