Consistency is the most important characteristic of a successful team, it's the reason people came to recognise the "Sky 4". We were getting there. Usually beating the teams we might be expected to beat, losing very few games, being capable of beating any team on our day and showing consistent improvement season on season. Unfortunately, that's not exciting enough for the internet/Sky generation who are more interested in viewing football as soap opera. Where every player and coach is a goodie or a baddie and the results are secondary to their own interpretation of the characters and storyline. For them, consistency is boring even if the results are the best they've seen in years.
Spurs are not a wealthy club in comparison to the 'SKY 4' or Citeh. I dont expect them to invest heavily. Allegedly had cash flow issues in January and needed to offload. (That assertion is based on rumour not first hand evidence.)
Quote from: Sam Smith on May 22, 2011, 10:24:21 AMSpurs are not a wealthy club in comparison to the 'SKY 4' or Citeh. I dont expect them to invest heavily. Allegedly had cash flow issues in January and needed to offload. (That assertion is based on rumour not first hand evidence.)Their last accounts (up to June 2010) didn't look massively healthy. Cash down on the previous year; loan interest payments of £5m a year. Those results were before the Champions League money came in but also before taking account of them buying Van Der Vaart and Sandro. So them struggling in January wouldn't surprise me.They could really struggle this year without the Champions League cash - there's no parachute payment from the Champions League! We could see them offloading their stars again like the year Berbatov went (although that turned out pretty well for them!).
Appointing a competent manager in the summer would be a good start.