Strange. I thought MON and Randy were back on good terms now? If so just agree to disagree. It's not as if MON is short of a couple of quid.
Quote from: PaulTheVillan on March 03, 2011, 10:12:51 AMin Martin O'Neill dispute with us. Over departure in August, means case will be settled by a tribunal.http://www.twitter.com/OliverKayTimesI thought he was on a rolling one year deal? He walked didn't he?hhhhmmmThink you're right he was on a rolling one year contract so the assumption is he was under contract for another year or so. Tribunal involvement seems to suggest his 'walking' may have been with some assistance? Maybe the discussion was along the lines of....MON: 'If you don't give me the Milner money I'll walk'RL: 'Well, I'm not giving you the Milner money until you offload some of the deadwood you've bought'MON: ' So you're not giving me the money, and I'll take you for constructive dismissal'I suppose given MON's propensity for things legal we shouldn't be surprised, but whether we actually get to hear the real story is another matter
in Martin O'Neill dispute with us. Over departure in August, means case will be settled by a tribunal.http://www.twitter.com/OliverKayTimesI thought he was on a rolling one year deal? He walked didn't he?hhhhmmm
Quote from: JUAN PABLO on March 03, 2011, 11:27:28 AMRichard Keys on Talksport, If you sack a manager , pay him , whats the problem here, eh?? didnt the twat walk out Keys is a hairy handed misinformed twat.
Richard Keys on Talksport, If you sack a manager , pay him , whats the problem here, eh?? didnt the twat walk out
What an odious little man. I hate him more now.
He fucking walked out.I sincerley hope we tell him to fuck off.Bottling Four eyed fuck.
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on March 03, 2011, 10:43:26 AMHe fucking walked out.I sincerley hope we tell him to fuck off.Bottling Four eyed fuck.Amazing how those who have this obsession with MON can convince themselves that they know what happened to cause MON to leave the club. Noone here knows a thing and throwing insult after insult will not change it although these hissy fits may make you feel that you do.
I get he's attempting to argue constructive dismissal on the grounds the club made his position untenable. This was what Curbishley successfully argued against West Ham when they sold Anton Ferdinand against his wishes (I'd argue the Board were right with hindsight!). He might be arguing a similar case with Milner.
I think he will get a pay-off of some kind, and I hope he invests it wisely.