collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Rod Liddle in The Times  (Read 25963 times)

Offline Villa'Zawg

  • Member
  • Posts: 11005
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #15 on: January 09, 2011, 05:39:58 PM »
Just remember: when they are critical of the Villa it is "lazy, incompetent journalism written by an alcoholic twat who has supported variously ManYoo, the dippers, The Arse or those blue c***s in Lahndan". if they praise the Villa it is a "great article, that".
Maybe so, but is Rod Littlecock correct in saying that MON had 'scant resources' ?

No

Compared to the rest of the top 6? Yes.

Say it often enough and you might start to believe it yourself.


It helps that it's also true.

Offline Matt C

  • Member
  • Posts: 5750
  • Location: Southern California
  • GM : 18.06.2020
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #16 on: January 09, 2011, 05:49:38 PM »
'Scant resources' aaaaaaaaggggggghhhhh.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61586
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #17 on: January 09, 2011, 05:50:13 PM »
It helps that it's also true.

I'm sure you'll be able to consult your vast array of spreadsheets to provide the evidence.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49496
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #18 on: January 09, 2011, 05:51:33 PM »
In the time O'Neill was at the club, we spent more than the majority of the clubs in the league. He did not suffer from 'scant resources'.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 29986
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #19 on: January 09, 2011, 06:04:53 PM »
In his 3 summers and Jan windows of spending he had more than Liverpool, Arsenal and I would wager Spurs in net spend. United - close too, and Everton (top 6 with us 3 of those years) significantly more than. Leaving erm... Man City. The others remember made a lot more than us from sales, and you can't count Milner in terms of the money coming back as it was after he left.

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #20 on: January 09, 2011, 06:06:22 PM »
It helps that it's also true.

I'm sure you'll be able to consult your vast array of spreadsheets to provide the evidence.

Please God, no.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8643
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 12.02.2025
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #21 on: January 09, 2011, 06:06:54 PM »
Please dont mention Spurs net spend, I dont think I can take it.

Offline TheSandman

  • Member
  • Posts: 34781
  • Age: 33
  • Location: The seaside town that they forgot to bomb
  • GM : May, 2013
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #22 on: January 09, 2011, 06:10:10 PM »
Just remember: when they are critical of the Villa it is "lazy, incompetent journalism written by an alcoholic twat who has supported variously ManYoo, the dippers, The Arse or those blue c***s in Lahndan". if they praise the Villa it is a "great article, that".
Maybe so, but is Rod Littlecock correct in saying that MON had 'scant resources' ?

No

Compared to the rest of the top 6? Yes.

Maybe. Compared to the rest of the premier league he was rolling in it. Compared to teams in seventh, eighth etc...

Between charging for the website and some of the ill-informed bullshit that passes for journalism in it (and I'm not on about this kind of thing as it's an opinion piece) I've stopped taking the Times.

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #23 on: January 09, 2011, 06:11:33 PM »
Surely if our wage bill was stretched to 85% of turnover, that shows that he never had 'scant' resources.

I'm sure Habib Beye would agree with me as he wipes his arse on £50 notes.

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #24 on: January 09, 2011, 06:27:34 PM »
I think he's talking players at his disposal.

In this area, MON did do well with 'scant resources'.

That said, it was MON himself who ensured that the resources were scant.


Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39969
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 12.06.2024
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2011, 06:29:36 PM »
It helps that it's also true.

I don't believe you?

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16652
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2025
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2011, 06:30:13 PM »
[quote author=CorkVilla link=topic=41788.msg1670601#msg1670601 date=1294592071
Truth be told, Gabriel Aghbonlahor and Ashley Young are not quite possessed of the quixotic brilliance O'Neill forever insisted they had at their disposal; they are okay, nothing much more. Villa, for the past few years, have been a case of mind over matter.'
He then goes on further about the 'sense of entitlement' and 'human right to be challenging for Europe' that afflicts Premier League clubs.
[/quote]

Rod Liddle generally writes in a seemingly-uninformed manner about many things; apparently the right of those who write in the press. However, his opinons expressed in the quotes above are not far off the mark (although harsh re Gabby; but remember that he saw him on loan at Millwall, when he was described as having the "touch of a rapist") and particularly regarding the impression that many Preeeemiership clubs somehow have God-given rights.
I don't like Liddle or his sneering journalistic style ... doesn't mean he's always wrong.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2011, 06:46:58 PM »
Villa prospered under O'Neill because they ground out results against the bottom 14 teams with great consistancy, despite not - to my mind - having very much in the way of flair to distinguish themselves from the also-rans.
I seem to remember Villa taking 4pts off Manyoo last season, 3pts off Chelsea and Liverpool, and a couple off Spurz.

This guy isn't very knowledgeable about Villa, is he?

Also, it was home results against those bottom 4 teams that cost us 4th place.

You can forgive not being knowledgeable about every team, but at least do some basic research.

Offline Villa'Zawg

  • Member
  • Posts: 11005
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2011, 06:58:38 PM »
"When he bought the club, you knew you were going to have to pay the price to buy it and then spend on players initially over a number of years.

"We've spent £140m on players and - net - it's still nearly £100m. 22/12/10 Paul Faulkner

Even if you allow him to stretch the boundaries of acceptable use of the word "nearly" in that way, our entire squad was built on that amount plus Agbonlahor.

 I'd be delighted to hear an objective and sensible argument for how one of the other top 6 squads having been built on less resources but I don't think there is one.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39969
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 12.06.2024
Re: Rod Little in The Times
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2011, 07:08:32 PM »
Spurs if you include the wage bill as well.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal