Quote from: kerms on December 31, 2010, 03:53:30 PMCeltic have just signed this guy,, he's fit for the first time in ages,, in my opinion a much much better bet than pires !!!!what a ludicrous post, you are a short sighted idiot! Pires was signed because we had no players and he was fit, available and able to start straight away. Some people will moan about fucking anything!
Celtic have just signed this guy,, he's fit for the first time in ages,, in my opinion a much much better bet than pires !!!!
Probably because Pires was signed when we had no players. Whereas it's January now and we're able to sign players.
There needs to be a facepalm smiley.
Quote from: rutski on December 31, 2010, 04:06:58 PMQuote from: kerms on December 31, 2010, 03:53:30 PMCeltic have just signed this guy,, he's fit for the first time in ages,, in my opinion a much much better bet than pires !!!!what a ludicrous post, you are a short sighted idiot! Pires was signed because we had no players and he was fit, available and able to start straight away. Some people will moan about fucking anything!You are of course basing your comments on what ?? A short sighted idiot am I ?? I believe the signing of Pires to be one of the worst signings villa have ever made, a la Balaban, this guy will never make an impact, is getting driven around like royalty , and will never be as committed to Villa as Bannan is , so why sign him ??Moan about Fucking Anything ?? Please point out my other moans on this site ??My Point was and still is,, if Villa are now looking at these kind of signings , why havent we signed him ?? Surely he is the same kind of risk as Pires yet he was hailed as a saviour !!!
Quote from: JJ-AV on December 31, 2010, 03:58:17 PMProbably because Pires was signed when we had no players. Whereas it's January now and we're able to sign players.Is the correct answer
Pires was a fucking shocking signingi would have gladly played anyone of our outstanding kids than a 37 year old frenchman who cant even run