It all depends why MON left and if he is the one who should apologise (as opposed to Randy & co)
Quote from: woo on December 08, 2010, 09:17:02 AMBy the way, hello Mr Woo, I prefer to be a bit more informal and not use titles!Sorry about that mate, its a user name I've used on other non-Villa related forums for years. No intention to nick yours. ;-)
By the way, hello Mr Woo, I prefer to be a bit more informal and not use titles!
Interesting question a mate of mine put to us this morning (not that its ever going to happen of course)...If you were Randy Lerner, and Martin O' Neill rang you last night after the game, apologised for the way he left, said he was way too hasty and wanted to give the job another crack - would you pay Houllier off and give MON his old job back?In other words - Straight choice - who would YOU trust to get us out of this rut?MON the motivator and hoofball merchant or GH who has us passing the thing at long last but without the results to show for it?
Quote from: mr woo on December 07, 2010, 09:13:21 PMInteresting question a mate of mine put to us this morning (not that its ever going to happen of course)...If you were Randy Lerner, and Martin O' Neill rang you last night after the game, apologised for the way he left, said he was way too hasty and wanted to give the job another crack - would you pay Houllier off and give MON his old job back?In other words - Straight choice - who would YOU trust to get us out of this rut?MON the motivator and hoofball merchant or GH who has us passing the thing at long last but without the results to show for it?I think there are two answers to that question.1. If it's a straight 'who would be better for us right now' then from a pure football perspective I'd say MON as what we need right now is a bit of character and resilience on the pitch, which his sides certainly had.2. If it's a case of would his return work in the real world, then no - too much water under the bridge now!