I think we'd be better selling Ash to fund a move for a top class striker.
meh
It's said all players have their price.A couple of years ago I'd have said Ash was irreplaceable. His delivery from corners and set pieces was the best seen in the Prem since Beckham in his pomp.For whatever reason, the quality in his crossing is just not there any more on a consistent basis and while I'd be sorry to see him go he's no longer irreplaceable.
To be honest, as long as the money can be entirely re-invested, it doesn't bother me. Ash has underachieved for the last two years to be frank. He's far too inconsistent.Granted he's sometimes brilliant, but those days seem to be a rarity, especially since the turn of the year. With Albrighton emerging and Bannan too, as well as Downing now performing to a high standard, I think we'd be better selling Ash to fund a move for a top class striker. Can we live without him on the wing? Yes. Is he irreplaceable as a front man? No way.These days he frustrates me more than anything else, and I feel if there's a time to cash in, it's now. If we did it in January, we could ask for an exorbitant fee too. I have no real expectations this season, beyond consolidating, so I don't see it being something that would implode a top 4 push, because we're too far off to sustain one now. This is the season for the kids, and for GH to get things his way.
Swap him for a few of their players perhaps? Bendtner, Walcott and one or two others might enter the equation? I'd gladly take Gibbs off their hands, think he is going to be some player...
Not so long ago, Norm in Canada (?) started a thread posing the question - 'what if we sold Ashley Young and used the money to improve the squad'? He was absolutely, and almost unanimously, slated. How quickly things change....