Re: John O'Shea - £80k a week. That's the economics that United will now have to deal with after agreeing Rooney's new deal. All the other players will use that as a marker. Leaving the money aside, it makes sense for them to keep him. He can play in the middle or at full back, and with Ferdinand as injury prone as Owen and Neville due for retirement, it gives Fergie experienced cover.
... it's an absolutely obscene number. Man U have set a dangerous precedent with this, and I hope it does not become the norm across the Premiership.
Quote from: Dante Lavelli on October 28, 2010, 05:22:35 PM... it's an absolutely obscene number. Man U have set a dangerous precedent with this, and I hope it does not become the norm across the Premiership.Man Utd makes three times the amount of money that a club like Villa (for example) makes. So they pay higher salaries. This doesn't set a norm for the Premiership, any more than Yaya Toure's stupid salary does. O'Shea's salary is in line with the size of his club.
Quote from: RonBurgundy on October 28, 2010, 09:30:09 AMQuote from: wif on October 28, 2010, 08:42:03 AMQuote from: The Situation on October 28, 2010, 01:45:12 AMI just find it incredibly sad and depressing that a (very average) back-up RB is getting paid that amount of money. He's good enough to be a regular first team choice player for one of the best teams in the world.He's a long-term choice of the finest football managers of recent times.His club takes in £278 million a year. He takes out an approximately one seventieth share of that. About 1.4% of their earnings.Isn't that a fair share for the amount of money he helps to generate? I'm sad and depressed that I don't earn that kind of money, but that's because I don't do anything which generates anything like that kind of money. Still, the tax he pays on £4 million a year will pay the salaries of about 100 nurses, which should make you feel happy and elated...Not so sure about the last bit - aren't footballers all tax dodging scoundrels to add to the list of reasons to not like them?Its quite hard to dodge tax when everyone knows how much you earn and you cant claim to live in another country for 9 months of the year because you're one the telly every week.
Quote from: wif on October 28, 2010, 08:42:03 AMQuote from: The Situation on October 28, 2010, 01:45:12 AMI just find it incredibly sad and depressing that a (very average) back-up RB is getting paid that amount of money. He's good enough to be a regular first team choice player for one of the best teams in the world.He's a long-term choice of the finest football managers of recent times.His club takes in £278 million a year. He takes out an approximately one seventieth share of that. About 1.4% of their earnings.Isn't that a fair share for the amount of money he helps to generate? I'm sad and depressed that I don't earn that kind of money, but that's because I don't do anything which generates anything like that kind of money. Still, the tax he pays on £4 million a year will pay the salaries of about 100 nurses, which should make you feel happy and elated...Not so sure about the last bit - aren't footballers all tax dodging scoundrels to add to the list of reasons to not like them?
Quote from: The Situation on October 28, 2010, 01:45:12 AMI just find it incredibly sad and depressing that a (very average) back-up RB is getting paid that amount of money. He's good enough to be a regular first team choice player for one of the best teams in the world.He's a long-term choice of the finest football managers of recent times.His club takes in £278 million a year. He takes out an approximately one seventieth share of that. About 1.4% of their earnings.Isn't that a fair share for the amount of money he helps to generate? I'm sad and depressed that I don't earn that kind of money, but that's because I don't do anything which generates anything like that kind of money. Still, the tax he pays on £4 million a year will pay the salaries of about 100 nurses, which should make you feel happy and elated...
I just find it incredibly sad and depressing that a (very average) back-up RB is getting paid that amount of money.
Quote from: wif on October 28, 2010, 05:36:32 PMQuote from: Dante Lavelli on October 28, 2010, 05:22:35 PM... it's an absolutely obscene number. Man U have set a dangerous precedent with this, and I hope it does not become the norm across the Premiership.Man Utd makes three times the amount of money that a club like Villa (for example) makes. So they pay higher salaries. This doesn't set a norm for the Premiership, any more than Yaya Toure's stupid salary does. O'Shea's salary is in line with the size of his club. I disagree. O'Shea's salary should be in line with his talent, not the size/turnover of Man United. Based on supply and demand I think there are many right backs that could do a job as good (or better) than O'Shea who would accept less money. Therefore there is - in my opinion - a risk that other players will use O'Shea as justification for insane wage demands.
Premier League stars using loophole to save millions in tax