Clark looks like he could be as good as Cahill.
Cueller was immense against Wolves. Getting dropped for Dunne was very strange IMO, and Dunne subsequently had a stinker. It's all I've disagreed with GED so far in the hotseat, is his treatment of Cueller. I kind of understand the left foot issue with Clark coming on, but really, Cueller's experience might have been more useful. Thankfully Clarky had a good game though.In my opinion Carlos is the best defender we've got. His anticipation is brilliant and he covers gaps and reads the game superbly.
Quote from: supertom on October 17, 2010, 03:45:08 PMCueller was immense against Wolves. Getting dropped for Dunne was very strange IMO, and Dunne subsequently had a stinker. It's all I've disagreed with GED so far in the hotseat, is his treatment of Cueller. I kind of understand the left foot issue with Clark coming on, but really, Cueller's experience might have been more useful. Thankfully Clarky had a good game though.In my opinion Carlos is the best defender we've got. His anticipation is brilliant and he covers gaps and reads the game superbly. This.
Quote from: Bald Eagle on October 17, 2010, 09:00:21 PMQuote from: supertom on October 17, 2010, 03:45:08 PMCueller was immense against Wolves. Getting dropped for Dunne was very strange IMO, and Dunne subsequently had a stinker. It's all I've disagreed with GED so far in the hotseat, is his treatment of Cueller. I kind of understand the left foot issue with Clark coming on, but really, Cueller's experience might have been more useful. Thankfully Clarky had a good game though.In my opinion Carlos is the best defender we've got. His anticipation is brilliant and he covers gaps and reads the game superbly. This.Well, if your plan is to keep possession of the ball for longer periods than we are accustomed to then it's a better idea that you have players who are more comfortable with the ball. Clarke is better on the ball than Cuellar, as are all the centre halves we have. Cuellar will get his chance again when the bruising sides show up where his attributes and experience are better than Clarke's are at the moment.
Quote from: Bren_d on October 17, 2010, 09:14:11 PMQuote from: Bald Eagle on October 17, 2010, 09:00:21 PMQuote from: supertom on October 17, 2010, 03:45:08 PMCueller was immense against Wolves. Getting dropped for Dunne was very strange IMO, and Dunne subsequently had a stinker. It's all I've disagreed with GED so far in the hotseat, is his treatment of Cueller. I kind of understand the left foot issue with Clark coming on, but really, Cueller's experience might have been more useful. Thankfully Clarky had a good game though.In my opinion Carlos is the best defender we've got. His anticipation is brilliant and he covers gaps and reads the game superbly. This.Well, if your plan is to keep possession of the ball for longer periods than we are accustomed to then it's a better idea that you have players who are more comfortable with the ball. Clarke is better on the ball than Cuellar, as are all the centre halves we have. Cuellar will get his chance again when the bruising sides show up where his attributes and experience are better than Clarke's are at the moment.The main priority of a centre back is to defend. They also hunt in pairs, as strikers used to do. Carlos and collins were spot on at Wolves.Clark and Dunne were desperate at Newcastle. Dunne and Collins were far from great at Spurs. Distribution is a plus but the priority must be to defend.