Every season its the same. Buying players at times is a lot like buying a house in that tehre are many parties in the chain. Milner going to Man City will mean Player A comes to us, and Team B then sign Player B, and so on. If we, or man City pull-out then the chain breaks but there is enough will on both side sto get it done. Its probably the minor details that are being finalised as we speak.
So my question wasIf you name your squad of 25 what happens to the players not picked?Do they have a year off on full pay?
Quote from: "Hookeysmith"So my question wasIf you name your squad of 25 what happens to the players not picked?Do they have a year off on full pay?The 25-man squad only counts for the league, so they could still play cup and European games.
Quote from: "peter w"Every season its the same. Buying players at times is a lot like buying a house in that tehre are many parties in the chain. Milner going to Man City will mean Player A comes to us, and Team B then sign Player B, and so on. If we, or man City pull-out then the chain breaks but there is enough will on both side sto get it done. Its probably the minor details that are being finalised as we speak.However, it appears as though it is just Man City with money this time around.Spurs have just made Champions League, why are they not spending.Maybe they don't want to do a Leeds?Liverpool have a new manager but seem to be scratching around at the lower end of the market.Hicks and Gillette are about to sell the clubMan Utd have (supposedly!) the bulk of the Renaldo money burning a hole in their pocket.They also have £800m woth of debt they are only just servicingChelsea have an ageing side in need of surgery and even the Russian gasoline crook is not splashing the cash.Abramovich has said several times that Chelsea will need to be self financing as he won't continue to bank roll them.Arsenal are just being Arsenal, so no change there.With the exception of Arsenal, all of the above teams have reason to buy and buy big but they are not. Why?
I wouldn't say football has run out of money, if anything there has never been as much money in football ever, the problem is that there are far to many ordinary players on ridiculous wages.
Quote from: "Bigmelonface"I wouldn't say football has run out of money, if anything there has never been as much money in football ever, the problem is that there are far to many ordinary players on ridiculous wages.You're right in saying that there has never been as much money in football as now but there is no liquidity to fund transfers of players. That is why I asked the question "has football run out of money".Again, you are right in that too much money is being paid to players. Also, significant money is being spent by the top clubs on players from outside England. Both of these are draining money out of football. Football only seems to be surviving on Sky money and new owners coming in.The news of HMRC losing their case against Portsmouth and their comment that they are going to look at PL clubs more closely is bound to have a negative effect on the money in the game (although probably a positive effect on the game itself).