A good player but just a full-back. That's the football equivalent of being a bass player.
Nuts that we are letting him to go.Liverpool get a better right-back than they currently have and a better left-back than they currently have all for the price of one player.
I see a lot of people are saying we're better off without him and so on we need someone younger etc etc. I agree Luke Young is not all that and that we could use a younger player but such is the scarcity of good right backs he is still one of the better ones around. I also see very little agreement from anyone on the right man to replace him.
Quote from: "TheSandman"I see a lot of people are saying we're better off without him and so on we need someone younger etc etc. I agree Luke Young is not all that and that we could use a younger player but such is the scarcity of good right backs he is still one of the better ones around. I also see very little agreement from anyone on the right man to replace him.Has anyone said that? All I see is comments that he's not irreplacable.I'd target Mich Richards as his replacement, Milner deal or not!
Bands need good bass players though not as much as guitarists, lead singers and drummers. You only notice the bass player if he's shit.
I've always thought Richards would be absolutely ideal for us. Not because he's the best right back around, just that he's the right age and the right sort of character to thrive amongst our players.He's potentially a fantastic player too.
Quote from: "Mazrim"I've always thought Richards would be absolutely ideal for us. Not because he's the best right back around, just that he's the right age and the right sort of character to thrive amongst our players.He's potentially a fantastic player too.I can't see City parting with him unfortunately.
Quote from: "John M"Good player and want him to stay, but I share the feeling that something hasn't been quite right since his brother's death.Although I rate him I don't think he's so good that we can't buy a younger version, so I'll judge if it's right or wrong once we see who the replacement is.Yes, I would agree with this. Hopefully his replacement isnt Carlos Cuellar who does a fine job when occasionally called upon but not a regular fixture there please.
Good player and want him to stay, but I share the feeling that something hasn't been quite right since his brother's death.Although I rate him I don't think he's so good that we can't buy a younger version, so I'll judge if it's right or wrong once we see who the replacement is.
Quote from: "Risso"Quote from: "Mazrim"I've always thought Richards would be absolutely ideal for us. Not because he's the best right back around, just that he's the right age and the right sort of character to thrive amongst our players.He's potentially a fantastic player too.I can't see City parting with him unfortunately.Yes, although I find that odd. They've replaced every other position with expensive signings. Sometimes twice. I'd be suprised if he stayed their right back for very long.