Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: Randolph villa on January 05, 2017, 11:49:39 PM

Title: RHM
Post by: Randolph villa on January 05, 2017, 11:49:39 PM
According to the mail,RHM has been omitted from the squad to play spurs ,due to him not signing a deal which would have made him the highest earning academy player in villa's history.
Fair play to Bruce for taking this stance,you can't have a young kid calling the shots,he's being very badly advised.with our lack of forwards at the minute,this could have been his chance to show us what he can do.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: olaftab on January 05, 2017, 11:52:34 PM
Something going on out there.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: aldridgeboy on January 05, 2017, 11:52:39 PM
Totally agree with SB. If he won't commit, he won't play.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: adrenachrome on January 05, 2017, 11:56:26 PM
Sounds as though the offer from Rangers is lucrative or another club is sniffing around.

 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 05, 2017, 11:59:45 PM
He'd be mental to turn us down for Zombie Rangers. If he's going to go, so be it. I'd have liked to have seen him involved more by now but there's no point in planning for the future if he's not going to be part of it. Decent decision by Bruce.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Havencheese on January 06, 2017, 12:27:23 AM
If he thinks he's bigger than the club well he can eventually go the way of so many who thought they'd already made it and dwell amongst the lower reaches.

He'll possibly become another John Bostock.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 06, 2017, 01:35:09 AM
Disappointing as I was looking forward to him giving the Spurs defence on Sunday.
If he does leave we will receive a fee set by an FA tribunal, is that right?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ROBBO on January 06, 2017, 02:45:59 AM
Can't we just put a price up say 2 million with add ons, if there are no takers it might bring him back to reality. Sick of players believing they are better than they are, how many players have left Villa and failed elsewhere? far more than have had success.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on January 06, 2017, 03:22:48 AM
Nobody's going to pay money for him when he can leave for free
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 06, 2017, 04:31:56 AM
When did this kid become the next Wayne Rooney? Fucking sign the contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 06, 2017, 04:34:50 AM
He'd be mental to turn us down for Zombie Rangers. If he's going to go, so be it. I'd have liked to have seen him involved more by now but there's no point in planning for the future if he's not going to be part of it. Decent decision by Bruce.

To be fair Zombie Rangers would be a pretty awesome name for a football team.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 06, 2017, 05:18:28 AM
Disappointed with this news. He'd of surely got a chance at some stage of the season, probably even on the bench against Spurs, going off what Bruce has said.

If he'd just waited til he got his opportunity and grabbed it with both hands, he could've maybe gone on to be a first team squad regular next season, summer transfer business permitting.

He'll probably say he's showing ambition by wanting a move where he'll get regular first team football, but the fact is, whilst he is clearly a promising talent, he is completely unproven at first team level. Unless I've missed the glaringly obvious?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gerrin on January 06, 2017, 05:51:08 AM
When did this kid become the next Wayne Rooney? Fucking sign the contract.

Exactly, shocking attitude. Offered a professional contract at 18 at one of the biggest clubs in England and he's prepared to let it slip away for what? Has he even started a game for us yet? The kid is definitely being poorly advised. If he goes, I'm 100% certain he won't make it at a bigger club than Villa, his attitude is all wrong already.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 06, 2017, 06:49:27 AM
Not just a contract. A contract that would make him the highest paid academy player in the club's history. Imagine what the likes of Brian Little, Gary shaw and Sid would make of hearing this news?

All the best, son...
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2017, 06:59:28 AM
Attitude seems to stink. His twitter acount doesn't inspire either. A bit Berahino lime without actually scoring any goals for the first team.  Shame as Villa will get bugger all for him.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 06, 2017, 07:14:49 AM
If we lose him I shall be very disappointed.  Just like I was disappointed to lose Marc Albrighton and  Adama Traore both discarded by us but adding ability to teams well above us.  A club that buys "ready made" players like McCormack, Elphick and Gestede has very little room to follow a hard line financial policy towards emerging young players.  I have followed RHM's career closely.  He would walk into a lower half Premiership side.  I am not suggesting a money is no object attitude to him or anybody else, just an across the board attitude to player value.  The use of the team sheet to whip players into line is a very crude instrument that often provokes intransigence. See Tshibola.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: frank black on January 06, 2017, 07:34:10 AM
It's a difficult one isn't it. Players/agents have the power in these situations and will push as far as possible for the best deal and who could blame them. Seems like a waste developing your own players if you can't at least get a full transfer value upon sale. I guess he knows what he can earn elsewhere and is asking us to match or beat it.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Hairbandinho on January 06, 2017, 07:42:39 AM
Meh.Never even broke through during our worst few seasons in history so is he actually any good?

Sure he will look better than he really is in that league just like Sinclair.. I doubt he will be missed. Obviously not up for the fight to displace the first team strikers here.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Axl Rose on January 06, 2017, 07:51:07 AM
Probably furious that Agbonlahor is in instead of him. Still, no player is bigger than the club.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 06, 2017, 07:56:46 AM
Yes, he is that good. Twenty times the player Gabby Agbonlahor is who is probably on fifty times his wages.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2017, 07:57:45 AM
Meh.Never even broke through during our worst few seasons in history so is he actually any good?

He's eighteen years old. At which point in the last few seasons do you think he should have "broken through"?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ads on January 06, 2017, 08:07:01 AM
He's 18 and doesn't want to play for the club her alleges to support by signing a contract that would make 99.99% of 18 year olds eyes bleed it would be so much.

Fuck off sunshine.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: villabear on January 06, 2017, 08:19:27 AM
The 'modern game' - having to give 'promising youngsters' lucrative contracts to keep them at the club.

He obviously being advised by his agent et al but it is coming across a bit Billy Big Bollox isn't it?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 06, 2017, 08:35:50 AM
I'd like to have seen more of him last season and this, but fuck him. He seems a decent prospect but he's 18, done sod all so far and is only on the first rug of the ladder. Bit early in your career to be thinking above your station.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bestmate on January 06, 2017, 08:47:55 AM
I'd like to have seen more of him last season and this, but fuck him. He seems a decent prospect but he's 18, done sod all so far and is only on the first rug of the ladder. Bit early in your career to be thinking above your station.

This is agent fuelled . Don't  want this kid to leave. Far too good  a prospect.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 06, 2017, 08:49:07 AM
In hindsight maybe Sherwood giving him a debut at 16 gave him early delusions of grandeur.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 06, 2017, 08:58:01 AM
I'd like to have seen more of him last season and this, but fuck him. He seems a decent prospect but he's 18, done sod all so far and is only on the first rug of the ladder. Bit early in your career to be thinking above your station.

This is agent fuelled . Don't  want this kid to leave. Far too good  a prospect.

I don't want him to go either, but even more I don't want some 18 year old that's done sod all acting Billy Big Balls. There's a massive jump from very good prospect to very good footballer. Farrelly, Moore brothers etc, and countless others around the country, have been big prospects at 16-18 and ultimately not done much.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 06, 2017, 09:03:13 AM
I don't see why we don't let him play if he can contribute right now.  Hutton & Bunn can leave for free in the summer and he's still playing them.  It doesn't seem to me that we have a strong enough squad to just leave valuable assets out the team for negotiating reasons - like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Of course it works both ways and does sound like he is being a bit of a knob.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 06, 2017, 09:05:17 AM
I don't see why we don't let him play if he can contribute right now.  Hutton & Bunn can leave for free in the summer and he's still playing them.  It doesn't seem to me that we have a strong enough squad to just leave valuable assets out the team for negotiating reasons - like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Of course it works both ways and does sound like he is being a bit of a knob.

Difference is (probably) that we haven't offered either of them a contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 06, 2017, 09:12:22 AM
I don't see why we don't let him play if he can contribute right now.  Hutton & Bunn can leave for free in the summer and he's still playing them.  It doesn't seem to me that we have a strong enough squad to just leave valuable assets out the team for negotiating reasons - like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Of course it works both ways and does sound like he is being a bit of a knob.

Difference is (probably) that we haven't offered either of them a contract.
Yes of course.  But still, if he is an asset we should use him.  Particularly when he is prepared to use Gabby
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tony Daleys Shorts on January 06, 2017, 09:15:32 AM
I'd like to have seen more of him last season and this, but fuck him. He seems a decent prospect but he's 18, done sod all so far and is only on the first rug of the ladder. Bit early in your career to be thinking above your station.

Bit harsh to carpet him like that?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 06, 2017, 09:17:33 AM
Bollocks, I mat have known my typo could lead to another punathon.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: flybo on January 06, 2017, 09:23:17 AM
He'd be mental to turn us down for Zombie Rangers. If he's going to go, so be it. I'd have liked to have seen him involved more by now but there's no point in planning for the future if he's not going to be part of it. Decent decision by Bruce.
do one you Smelltic fan WATP
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air on January 06, 2017, 09:24:12 AM
Fringe player who needs whipping into shape.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john2710 on January 06, 2017, 09:26:51 AM
I think it's clear he's not going to sign, time to move on & forget about him. He's probably using our offer to squeeze more out of other clubs.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 06, 2017, 09:29:14 AM
first rug of the ladder.

He's going to get carpeted for this behaviour.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2017, 09:45:45 AM
If we lose him I shall be very disappointed.  Just like I was disappointed to lose Marc Albrighton and  Adama Traore both discarded by us but adding ability to teams well above us.  A club that buys "ready made" players like McCormack, Elphick and Gestede has very little room to follow a hard line financial policy towards emerging young players.  I have followed RHM's career closely.  He would walk into a lower half Premiership side.  I am not suggesting a money is no object attitude to him or anybody else, just an across the board attitude to player value.  The use of the team sheet to whip players into line is a very crude instrument that often provokes intransigence. See Tshibola.

I was disappointed to see Adama go, but he wanted to leave. Marc Albrighton was offered £35K a week at Leicester, which meant he was always going to leave. RHM is refusing to sign a contract that would make him the best paid academy player. I don't think this is an issue with Villa not trying to retain talent.

Sounds to me like RHM has just got too big for his boots.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on January 06, 2017, 09:47:14 AM
It would appear that he has little intention of signing the contract offer ........ so from the managers point why play him when in few months he is gone

Seems like he wants to play simply to put himself in the shop window to earn a contract elsewhere

Maybe its fuelled by his agent and thats the problem with football today ...how many of the England 66 team had agents at the time? I am guessing none

As the manager has said sign or you are not part of first team squad - I have no problem with that
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: teamvillage on January 06, 2017, 09:58:34 AM
If we thought he was going to substantially help us this season, we'd be playing him, regardless of the contract position. Presumably we've no intention of developing him for another club to benefit.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tony Daleys Shorts on January 06, 2017, 09:59:14 AM
Bollocks, I mat have known my typo could lead to another punathon.

Yes, another one to add to the pile.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 06, 2017, 10:16:32 AM
There's a huge amonut of assumptions here.  It could be as simple as looking at the list of forwards in the squad, seeing a lot of them play badly and still get picked and realise that we've got no intention of giving him a chance.

I hate that whenever a youing player doesn't sign a new contract there's loads of posts on here about 'bad agents', 'poorly advised', 'too big for his boots'.  No one on here knows why he's not signed or what we and other clubs are offering him.  A big part of the reason so many of our youth players don't reach their potential is that we fuck up the integration in the first team.  If RHM does leave I'm putting it down to that same mistake.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 06, 2017, 10:19:03 AM
So you start by drawing attention to posters attaching a huge amount of assumptions and then finish with a huge assumption?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: villabear on January 06, 2017, 10:35:32 AM
Why we're talking about rugs I have no ikea
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: berneboy on January 06, 2017, 10:48:03 AM
Why we're talking about rugs I have no ikea

Very clever, Mr Bear. A smile upon my face.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Hairbandinho on January 06, 2017, 10:50:10 AM
Ah I must have missed all the top level strikers he was competing with since Benteke left for a place..l

If his ability and more importantly attitude were right he would have been given a chance in the team. His training clearly didn't show this to previous managers.

With the caveat that our previous managers all appear to have been mentally ill haha
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 06, 2017, 10:56:47 AM
So you start by drawing attention to posters attaching a huge amount of assumptions and then finish with a huge assumption?

yep, my problem isn't with making assumptions, it's with assuming that all the problems are about money and coming from the player.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 06, 2017, 10:58:53 AM
All I want to see is a consistently astute attitude by the club towards money.  Just like I thought a new contract for Gardner probably made good business sense, it would make good business sense to retain a young player we have developed rather than let him walk away as a free agent.  The sum that has to be done is which is better business for the club, to sign a thirty something year old from the bench of a struggling Premiership side for £5 million or pay £5 in wages to a young player with infinitely more sell on value.  To me it is a no brainer.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: papa lazarou on January 06, 2017, 11:01:35 AM
Why we're talking about rugs I have no ikea

Unfortunately, punathons are an underlaying irritation on this site.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Hairbandinho on January 06, 2017, 11:03:45 AM
He can f off, as can any other 'local lad' who is either taking us for a ride,is not good enough or has an inflated ego.See Gabby,Gardner,RHM. Just leave then if you think you are bigger than Villa. Villa will still exist long after your careers have washed up at Rotherham and Grimsby, fools.

Too many people with rose tinted glasses on here just because they are 'local lads' they get a free pass.

Later RHM and don't forget to thank villa for the huge money we have no doubt poured into you via the youth system when you are a superstar in the mighty Scottish league.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldtimernow on January 06, 2017, 11:11:33 AM
Any ideas as to who his agent is?

Does he have similar history in his other dealings?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rigadon on January 06, 2017, 11:12:53 AM
Yes, he is that good. Twenty times the player Gabby Agbonlahor is who is probably on fifty times his wages.

20 times better than a player who has played 300 games for the first team under various mangers? Gabbys shit attitude aside that seems a stretch based on no real evidence.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: VinnieChase84 on January 06, 2017, 11:15:32 AM
Same situation as Jerome Sinclair when he was at Liverpool. He was a much better propspect than RHM. Moves to Watford and hardly been seen since. The way Bruce is handling this is spot on. The offer is on the table and he prospect to play is available too. He probably would have started on Sunday.
RHM won't even play for a club as big as us ever again is my prediction. Probably end up at Bolton in a few years
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 06, 2017, 11:32:42 AM
I factored into my multiplicant of Gabby's relative worth compared with Rushian Hepburn-Murphy the fact that RHM has not neglected his training, pigged out on junk food, pissed away fortunes in casinos and was proudly photographed doing so, been all over the tabloids with his eyes rolled back into his skull, partied with slappers a roomful at a time, been the subject of paternity suits, been the star of the francophobe Secret Santa we enjoyed so much or called the fans "haterz".   I think my mathematics flatter Gabby if anything.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bestmate on January 06, 2017, 11:41:50 AM
I factored into my multiplicant of Gabby's relative worth compared with Rushian Hepburn-Murphy the fact that RHM has not neglected his training, pigged out on junk food, pissed away fortunes in casinos and was proudly photographed doing so, been all over the tabloids with his eyes rolled back into his skull, partied with slappers a roomful at a time, been the subject of paternity suits, been the star of the francophobe Secret Santa we enjoyed so much or called the fans "haterz".   I think my mathematics flatter Gabby if anything.

RHM would have done disturbingly well to achieve all that  by the  age of 18!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 06, 2017, 11:43:22 AM
Any ideas as to who his agent is?

Does he have similar history in his other dealings?

My guess is Agbonlahor is his agent, it's the only explanation for him being anywhere near the first team squad as Bruce is trying to keep him onside to get his client to sign the contract. Is he actually any good? I remember people raving about Gary Gardner and he looks pretty bloody useless to these untrained eyes.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rigadon on January 06, 2017, 11:43:52 AM
Haha! That did make me chuckle.  I suppose my reaction to your original post was that if this man-child isn't signing a contract because people in the background are telling him that he's 20 times the player Gabby is, it might be part of the problem.  In truth he/we will be lucky if he's as good as a player Gabby was in hi prime.  Any more than that will be unknown from our academy.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2017, 11:54:37 AM
So you start by drawing attention to posters attaching a huge amount of assumptions and then finish with a huge assumption?

yep, my problem isn't with making assumptions, it's with assuming that all the problems are about money and coming from the player.

I agree. If he's swapping our reserves for theirs then fair enough.

But if say, Rangers have said "we'll match whatever money Villa have offered but we'll put you straight into the first team from day one", then I don't really see what he's got to lose by going there and playing.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 06, 2017, 12:01:51 PM
He'd be mental to turn us down for Zombie Rangers. If he's going to go, so be it. I'd have liked to have seen him involved more by now but there's no point in planning for the future if he's not going to be part of it. Decent decision by Bruce.
do one you Smelltic fan WATP

"Smelltic" doesn't really work for a derogatory nickname for Clyde, mate.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Boz on January 06, 2017, 12:07:20 PM
Sounds as though the offer from Rangers is lucrative or another club is sniffing around.

His agent more like advising him scenting commission from a transfer
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 06, 2017, 12:49:12 PM
So you start by drawing attention to posters attaching a huge amount of assumptions and then finish with a huge assumption?

yep, my problem isn't with making assumptions, it's with assuming that all the problems are about money and coming from the player.

So assumptions are okay as long as they're yours? Wha' everrrrrrhhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on January 06, 2017, 12:52:21 PM
I still have a mental image of him coming on to make his debut and looking as if he was about to shit himself with nerves.

Surely someone can post the video of it on here?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Clampy on January 06, 2017, 12:57:01 PM
I saw him score a belter of a goal in pre-season at Stourport and I thought he'd have got more of a look in this season than he has. I hope he does end up signing, it would be a shame to see him go before seeing what he could do.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Lobsterboy on January 06, 2017, 01:04:38 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 06, 2017, 01:07:35 PM
So you start by drawing attention to posters attaching a huge amount of assumptions and then finish with a huge assumption?

yep, my problem isn't with making assumptions, it's with assuming that all the problems are about money and coming from the player.

So assumptions are okay as long as they're yours? Wha' everrrrrrhhhhhhhhhh

Yep, that's exactly what I said.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: TheMalandro on January 06, 2017, 01:11:21 PM
I'd like to see him progress here but it's his choice to make, he may be foolish but it's his contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: old man villa fan on January 06, 2017, 01:18:56 PM
There's a huge amonut of assumptions here.  It could be as simple as looking at the list of forwards in the squad, seeing a lot of them play badly and still get picked and realise that we've got no intention of giving him a chance.

I hate that whenever a youing player doesn't sign a new contract there's loads of posts on here about 'bad agents', 'poorly advised', 'too big for his boots'.  No one on here knows why he's not signed or what we and other clubs are offering him.  A big part of the reason so many of our youth players don't reach their potential is that we fuck up the integration in the first team.  If RHM does leave I'm putting it down to that same mistake.

I totally agree with your point on integration. I have mentioned it before and people respond that we have produced as many, if not more, players that go on to have a career in football but when was the last time we developed a top player, got good use out of him and then went elsewhere and continued with a good career. I suppose Gareth Barry was the last that fitted this.

Young players need developing by continually putting bigger challenges in front of them, usually quite quickly and then stepping them back, to go again from a higher starting point.

All this, my assumption is not quite as big as yours is rubbish. They are all possible reasons being put forward. Even the reported events may not be true. If it is true, Bruce should keep it between him and the player. The player is currently under contract and the club should be making the best use of that.

I am amazed that supporters' reaction to something like this is "fuck him then". Perhaps it is the throw away generation that we are in.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 06, 2017, 01:23:44 PM
I've zero idea what is stalling things, but would imagine that getting some game time and a clearer path to the first team would help grease the cogs towards signing.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 06, 2017, 01:28:18 PM
There's a huge amonut of assumptions here.  It could be as simple as looking at the list of forwards in the squad, seeing a lot of them play badly and still get picked and realise that we've got no intention of giving him a chance.

I hate that whenever a youing player doesn't sign a new contract there's loads of posts on here about 'bad agents', 'poorly advised', 'too big for his boots'.  No one on here knows why he's not signed or what we and other clubs are offering him.  A big part of the reason so many of our youth players don't reach their potential is that we fuck up the integration in the first team.  If RHM does leave I'm putting it down to that same mistake.

I totally agree with your point on integration. I have mentioned it before and people respond that we have produced as many, if not more, players that go on to have a career in football but when was the last time we developed a top player, got good use out of him and then went elsewhere and continued with a good career. I suppose Gareth Barry was the last that fitted this.

Young players need developing by continually putting bigger challenges in front of them, usually quite quickly and then stepping them back, to go again from a higher starting point.

All this, my assumption is not quite as big as yours is rubbish. They are all possible reasons being put forward. Even the reported events may not be true. If it is true, Bruce should keep it between him and the player. The player is currently under contract and the club should be making the best use of that.

I am amazed that supporters' reaction to something like this is "fuck him then". Perhaps it is the throw away generation that we are in.

Exactly, that's the bit I don't like.  It's all a bit like having a supermodel girlfriend leave you and telling everyone you were thinking of dumping her anyway and you can do better.  At some point you have to stop and think that it might, after all, be your own fault.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 06, 2017, 01:31:12 PM
Twas ever thus. If any player thinks they can do better without proving they are worth anything more than what we are prepared to offer then fine, go. Sometimes it can blow up in the club;s face but that is very very seldom. I'd like him to stay but not because I think he has a chance of doing something good but just because he may as well be here than elsewhere if he is going to progress well. But, we've offered him a contract he wants more than that. Fine. he's an 18 year-old upstart not the future of Aston Villa.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on January 06, 2017, 01:32:32 PM
Why we're talking about rugs I have no ikea

Unfortunately, punathons are an underlaying irritation on this site.

No need to exaggerate, get a grip.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tony Daleys Shorts on January 06, 2017, 01:58:51 PM
There's a huge amonut of assumptions here.  It could be as simple as looking at the list of forwards in the squad, seeing a lot of them play badly and still get picked and realise that we've got no intention of giving him a chance.

I hate that whenever a youing player doesn't sign a new contract there's loads of posts on here about 'bad agents', 'poorly advised', 'too big for his boots'.  No one on here knows why he's not signed or what we and other clubs are offering him.  A big part of the reason so many of our youth players don't reach their potential is that we fuck up the integration in the first team.  If RHM does leave I'm putting it down to that same mistake.

I totally agree with your point on integration. I have mentioned it before and people respond that we have produced as many, if not more, players that go on to have a career in football but when was the last time we developed a top player, got good use out of him and then went elsewhere and continued with a good career. I suppose Gareth Barry was the last that fitted this.

Young players need developing by continually putting bigger challenges in front of them, usually quite quickly and then stepping them back, to go again from a higher starting point.

All this, my assumption is not quite as big as yours is rubbish. They are all possible reasons being put forward. Even the reported events may not be true. If it is true, Bruce should keep it between him and the player. The player is currently under contract and the club should be making the best use of that.

I am amazed that supporters' reaction to something like this is "fuck him then". Perhaps it is the throw away generation that we are in.

Didn't we nick Barry from Brighton?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 06, 2017, 01:59:12 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.



That's just it. Sounds all a bit NRC. You talk yourself up, CL etc and end up on a free at Bolton
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Smith on January 06, 2017, 01:59:14 PM
Surely the fact that we are offering him such a lucrative deal should tell him and his agent that he is an important part of the club's future. If he is unwilling to sign the contract that is down to him but suggests either impatience, greed or arrogance on his part.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villan For Life on January 06, 2017, 02:10:02 PM
Assuming there are other clubs sniffing around, you have to ask just which sides would an inexperienced 18 year old walk into and get regular game time?

Regular posters on here whose views I respect have singled him out as a real prospect. However at the moment that's all he is a prospect, albeit an exciting one.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 06, 2017, 02:23:03 PM
I thought their earlier stuff was okay - especially Everybody Hurts, What's the Frequency Kenneth etc.  Not so sure what they've done lately mind.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on January 06, 2017, 02:29:04 PM
Dr Tony is now cryptically tweeting about RHM:

I very much agree with what Mourinho said that parents&agents are someones always ruin youngest's career, one way the other.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2017, 02:30:41 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.



That's just it. Sounds all a bit NRC. You talk yourself up, CL etc and end up on a free at Bolton

Maybe that's the point. Maybe he'd rather be playing in the first team for someone like Rangers rather than our reserves.

Like when Dembele went from Fuham to Celtic, rather than spending this season as a substitute for Spurs.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: godzvilla on January 06, 2017, 02:38:44 PM
Remember Daniel Crowley ?, our  last ' Wonderkid'  in waiting ( alleged ) . Decided he was too good for the Villa , was snapped up by Arsenal  and touted  as the next  Jack Wilshire. After  failed loan spells at Barnsley and Oxford , he went  on loan to Go Ahead Eagles in the Eredvisie, where he now plays.
As they say : " Someone else ' indespensable' and 'unique ' can always be found at a  moments notice"..........Godzvilla!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Smith on January 06, 2017, 02:51:09 PM
I thought their earlier stuff was okay - especially Everybody Hurts, What's the Frequency Kenneth etc.  Not so sure what they've done lately mind.

Split up last year, I hope if the same fate befalls young Rushian we get the guitarist and singer rather than the rhythm section.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KevinGage on January 06, 2017, 02:52:59 PM
Remember Daniel Crowley ?, our  last ' Wonderkid'  in waiting ( alleged ) . Decided he was too good for the Villa , was snapped up by Arsenal  and touted  as the next  Jack Wilshire. After  failed loan spells at Barnsley and Oxford , he went  on loan to Go Ahead Eagles in the Eredvisie, where he now plays.
As they say : " Someone else ' indespensable' and 'unique ' can always be found at a  moments notice"..........Godzvilla!

He's 19, and still highly thought of at Arsenal by all accounts.  A bit early for the scrap heap.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Abbeyfealeavfc on January 06, 2017, 02:57:51 PM
Young players like RHM need role models within their club. When we've had the likes of lescott and nzogbia and currently richards and agbonlahor for young players to look up to, then as a club you know you're in trouble. While richards and agbonlahor continue to stink the place out we will continue to struggle in developing our young players for the good of Aston Villa instead of some other team.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 06, 2017, 03:12:02 PM
Young players like RHM need role models within their club. When we've had the likes of lescott and nzogbia and currently richards and agbonlahor for young players to look up to, then as a club you know you're in trouble. While richards and agbonlahor continue to stink the place out we will continue to struggle in developing our young players for the good of Aston Villa instead of some other team.
I'm sure there may be lots of things we can blame on Richards and Gabby.  But frankly it's a bit of a stretch to try to pin this one on them. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 06, 2017, 03:19:54 PM
I think if he was really that good , he would be playing week in week out . contract up or not I dont think we would have the luxury to leave him out
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tony Daleys Shorts on January 06, 2017, 03:27:29 PM
Why we're talking about rugs I have no ikea

Unfortunately, punathons are an underlaying irritation on this site.

No need to exaggerate, get a grip.

Isn't this thread supposed to be about Persian Hepburn-Murphy?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bad English on January 06, 2017, 03:54:53 PM
I hope he doesn't think he can shag this club after the backing he has had.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 06, 2017, 04:17:15 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.



That's just it. Sounds all a bit NRC. You talk yourself up, CL etc and end up on a free at Bolton

Maybe that's the point. Maybe he'd rather be playing in the first team for someone like Rangers rather than our reserves.

Like when Dembele went from Fuham to Celtic, rather than spending this season as a substitute for Spurs.

Or unlike NRC who already had a decent career under his belt at that stage, RHM would be better placed at 18 to stay at a club that will give him a chance if he works hard. It can't be that difficult for him to see we just sold a forward, are struggling for goals and if he just knuckled down he will get his chance. But he is being far too short sighted for that.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Abbeyfealeavfc on January 06, 2017, 04:20:28 PM
Re chrisw1
No stretch at all thanks. Just common sense, a knowledge of how psychology manifests itself in the workplace and some experience of the negative impact that one of the players you quoted has had on another Aston Villa youngster.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 06, 2017, 04:26:55 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.



That's just it. Sounds all a bit NRC. You talk yourself up, CL etc and end up on a free at Bolton

Maybe that's the point. Maybe he'd rather be playing in the first team for someone like Rangers rather than our reserves.

Like when Dembele went from Fuham to Celtic, rather than spending this season as a substitute for Spurs.

Or unlike NRC who already had a decent career under his belt at that stage, RHM would be better placed at 18 to stay at a club that will give him a chance if he works hard. It can't be that difficult for him to see we just sold a forward, are struggling for goals and if he just knuckled down he will get his chance. But he is being far too short sighted for that.

I disagree, we've sold a forward and seen another go to afcon and he was still only given a few minutes in a game crying out for something different whilst Gabby gets chnace after chance and RM starts a game out of position and looks lost.  I can understand him feeling that this month should be a chance but that he isn't going to be given it, especially when we've got the press linking us to new strikers.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:56 PM
Re chrisw1
No stretch at all thanks. Just common sense, a knowledge of how psychology manifests itself in the workplace and some experience of the negative impact that one of the players you quoted has had on another Aston Villa youngster.
Ah, bollocks.  His agent is probably having more of an impact than those two.  Get a grip.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 06, 2017, 04:33:27 PM
He needs someone to control him with a gripper rod of iron.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KevinGage on January 06, 2017, 04:48:31 PM
Wouldn't blame him for having second thoughts if he can't get in the side ahead of deadbeat Agbonlahor.

Warburton wasn't afraid to gamble on youth at Brentford. Haven't seen much of Rangers this year, but seeing as they aren't operating from a position of strength, wouldn't surprise me if he is doing similar there.

Bruce looks a bit shit in all this as well. Play him or don't play him. None of this 'Well I was going to play him, but now I'll punish him for having a mind of his own.' 

Would he do similar to a senior player; a first XI regular, say. One who was attracting interest from the PL or abroad and wouldn't immediately commit to a long-term deal?  Doubtful. He'd want to play his best possible side (at least you'd like to think) and make use of that player for however long he has left with us.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 06, 2017, 04:55:27 PM
But he isn't a first team player just a prospect. Unlike Gary Cahill he has very little first little first team experience whether in the team or match day squad. If he isn't intending to sign a contract despite being in the squad for the Tottenham game why should we develop him and give him the experience that someone else will benefit from? He's made his decision so Bruce may as well leave him out.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 06, 2017, 04:58:03 PM
He needs someone to control him with a gripper rod of iron.
he'll end up at Axminster Town.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeS on January 06, 2017, 06:11:02 PM
He wants a pile of cash
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Nastylee on January 06, 2017, 06:42:14 PM
I think we have always been guilty of bigging up our youth players. Very rarely have they gone on to better things. RHM  hasn't done anything to warrant the blind faith. Think of Owen and Rooney at his age. Plus, he's acting like a right tit so he can do one if he's not prepared to commit to the club. Can't see him being missed. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on January 06, 2017, 06:48:18 PM
Re chrisw1
No stretch at all thanks. Just common sense, a knowledge of how psychology manifests itself in the workplace and some experience of the negative impact that one of the players you quoted has had on another Aston Villa youngster.
Ah, bollocks.  His agent is probably having more of an impact than those two.  Get a grip.

Whoa there, I've already delivered that pun.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2017, 07:35:36 PM
With the greatest of respect to RHM if Glasgow Rangers are the only team showing much of an interest in his services then I would get that contract with us signed quick sharp.



That's just it. Sounds all a bit NRC. You talk yourself up, CL etc and end up on a free at Bolton

Maybe that's the point. Maybe he'd rather be playing in the first team for someone like Rangers rather than our reserves.

Like when Dembele went from Fuham to Celtic, rather than spending this season as a substitute for Spurs.

Or unlike NRC who already had a decent career under his belt at that stage, RHM would be better placed at 18 to stay at a club that will give him a chance if he works hard. It can't be that difficult for him to see we just sold a forward, are struggling for goals and if he just knuckled down he will get his chance. But he is being far too short sighted for that.

But looking at it objectively, why does it matter whether that club is Villa or Rangers? They'll both give him a chance if he works hard, but it seems like one will probably do it sooner than the other.

They're also the one that hasn't spent nearly £40m on strikers since he made his debut.

He may also have noticed that his current manager doesn't really have a strong track record of bringing young players through at his previous clubs.

I'd rather he wanted to stay with us, but it's hardly some great betrayal, and certainly not crazy if he thought he might have better options elsewhere.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john2710 on January 06, 2017, 07:46:47 PM
There's nothing to stop him signing a new contract and then going on loan somewhere to get games. Ultimately I think it's about money & trying to squeeze a bit more out of us or whatever club have approached him. If he was happy with what he's been offered, which is more than anyone else has ever got, he'd have signed it.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 06, 2017, 07:52:12 PM
My feeling is RHM has an underlaying problem.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 06, 2017, 07:54:30 PM

Bruce looks a bit shit in all this as well.


No he doesn't.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on January 06, 2017, 07:55:06 PM
My feeling is RHM has an underlaying problem.

Care to e-laminate?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: four fornicholl on January 06, 2017, 07:56:35 PM
My feeling is RHM has an underlaying problem.

Care to e-laminate?
Hes Aladdin a pickle.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 06, 2017, 08:02:48 PM
Young players like RHM need role models within their club. When we've had the likes of lescott and nzogbia and currently richards and agbonlahor for young players to look up to, then as a club you know you're in trouble. While richards and agbonlahor continue to stink the place out we will continue to struggle in developing our young players for the good of Aston Villa instead of some other team.
I agree that workplace role models have a massive impact; in both the positive and the negative. I see it a lot in the work I do, as well as when Reffing.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 06, 2017, 08:05:09 PM
I think we have always been guilty of bigging up our youth players. Very rarely have they gone on to better things. RHM  hasn't done anything to warrant the blind faith. Think of Owen and Rooney at his age. Plus, he's acting like a right tit so he can do one if he's not prepared to commit to the club. Can't see him being missed. 
re you last sentence, we won't know since SB ain't playing him!

Do I remember correctly in thinking that the Arse showed some interest in him a while back? Or was that Andre Green?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: old man villa fan on January 06, 2017, 08:46:31 PM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rigadon on January 06, 2017, 08:50:33 PM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?

The most the club has ever offered any similar player apparently.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: frank black on January 06, 2017, 08:53:06 PM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?

The most the club has ever offered any similar player apparently.

Plenty dollar. Not that the club ever divulge such info
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: old man villa fan on January 06, 2017, 08:55:26 PM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?

The most the club has ever offered any similar player apparently.

and what was that?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: passport1 on January 06, 2017, 10:03:11 PM
I'd like to have seen more of him last season and this, but fuck him. He seems a decent prospect but he's 18, done sod all so far and is only on the first rug of the ladder. Bit early in your career to be thinking above your station.

This is agent fuelled . Don't  want this kid to leave. Far too good  a prospect.

I agree it is likely to be agent instigated.I don't understand the vitriol aimed at the lad. I doubt atb18 he is calling any shots just doing what he is being told to do.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: clash city rocker on January 06, 2017, 10:17:18 PM
Agents = leeches
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Nastylee on January 06, 2017, 10:27:11 PM
I think we have always been guilty of bigging up our youth players. Very rarely have they gone on to better things. RHM  hasn't done anything to warrant the blind faith. Think of Owen and Rooney at his age. Plus, he's acting like a right tit so he can do one if he's not prepared to commit to the club. Can't see him being missed. 
re you last sentence, we won't know since SB ain't playing him!

Do I remember correctly in thinking that the Arse showed some interest in him a while back? Or was that Andre Green?

The same as Man Utd about to buy Steven Davis or Gabby to Arsenal or whoever. It's all bollocks in these days of social media where one tweet can go viral and be believed.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: frank black on January 06, 2017, 10:53:50 PM
Are we about to "do a Pogba" ?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 06, 2017, 11:38:31 PM
It's a difficult one to judge given he's played so few minutes for us. I didn't go to Newcastle or Cardiff so have never seen him play live.

Who knows what was said behind the scenes pre season....if RDM told him he'd get a chance this season, he's put the work in on the training ground and 6 months on he's made two sub appearances and Gabby waltzes in ahead I too would probably be questioning if this was the best club to go forward with.

He clearly just wants to play....again maybe he pushed to go out on loan in August and was told to stay so he feels like he's wasted 6 months of his career. You compare it to Newcastle who've been loaning out Adam Amstrong to different clubs every season and he's progressing well.

I really don't think it's about money...if it is I have little sympathy. If it's for football reasons then I can see RHM's viewpoint.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Duncan Shaw on January 06, 2017, 11:52:36 PM
Stan Petrov encouraging him to go to Rangers in the Meaning evil
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: old man villa fan on January 07, 2017, 12:09:15 AM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?

The most the club has ever offered any similar player apparently.

and what was that?

So who was our last highest paid academy player?  Who was our last good prospect?  If he was from more than 2 or 3 seasons ago, with wages going up dramatically and with this filtering down to young players, it stands to reason that RHM would more than likely be our highest earning academy player ever.

'Highest earning academy player ever' is emotive language when facts and figures are not known.  It could be £1 more than the last and the statement would still be correct.  I should imagine it is quite a bit more but you can understand what I am getting at.  I do not know and I doubt whether many fans know either.

I hope Bruce knows what he is doing on this because he is making an example of a young kid (again, assuming the story is correct).  He could have played it low key.  However, I could be looking at it from the wrong angle and the information has been leaked by the player or his agent.

I am not a party to the facts and so at this time I will not criticise the player or the manager based on assumptions.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave on January 07, 2017, 12:30:56 AM
I really don't think it's about money...if it is I have little sympathy. If it's for football reasons then I can see RHM's viewpoint.

One thing's for sure, if there's one club that's going to be throwing millions of pounds at a young prospect on a bit of a punt, it's not going to be penniless Rangers.

Probably the only club who can make Birmingham City's 2013-2016 spending look like Manchester City.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: adrenachrome on January 07, 2017, 12:55:32 AM
Stan Petrov encouraging him to go to Rangers in the Meaning evil

Quote

Club legend Stiliyan Petrov says young Aston Villa striker Rushian Hepburn-Murphy should join Rangers for the sake of his career.

Hepburn-Murphy has been offered a new contract by Villa amid interest from Ibrox and he featured in the defeat at Cardiff City because boss Steve Bruce was told he was close to signing a huge new bumper deal.

But there has still been no breakthrough and Bruce has decided to withdraw the 18-year-old from the group ahead of the FA Cup third round trip to Tottenham on Sunday.

Petrov believes Rangers boss Mark Warburton should sign the youngster to help progress his career.

“Rushian is a very exciting young striker,” Petrov said. “He’s very quick and he would make a difference for Rangers.

“He’s one of those players that you love to have in the team but you hate to play against.

“He’s a very exciting young prospect and I would like to see Rushian moving away from Villa and having a chance somewhere to progress because he’s got tons of ability.

“He hasn’t asked me about Scotland, but I’m going in next week so we’ll probably have a conversation if he wants to know anything about it.”

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Sexual Ealing on January 07, 2017, 01:07:02 AM
Stan Petrov encouraging him to go to Rangers in the Meaning evil

Quote

Club legend Stiliyan Petrov says young Aston Villa striker Rushian Hepburn-Murphy should join Rangers for the sake of his career.

Hepburn-Murphy has been offered a new contract by Villa amid interest from Ibrox and he featured in the defeat at Cardiff City because boss Steve Bruce was told he was close to signing a huge new bumper deal.

But there has still been no breakthrough and Bruce has decided to withdraw the 18-year-old from the group ahead of the FA Cup third round trip to Tottenham on Sunday.

Petrov believes Rangers boss Mark Warburton should sign the youngster to help progress his career.

“Rushian is a very exciting young striker,” Petrov said. “He’s very quick and he would make a difference for Rangers.

“He’s one of those players that you love to have in the team but you hate to play against.

“He’s a very exciting young prospect and I would like to see Rushian moving away from Villa and having a chance somewhere to progress because he’s got tons of ability.

He hasn’t asked me about Scotland, but I’m going in next week so we’ll probably have a conversation if he wants to know anything about it.”


I think he might find that he's not going in after all.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Risso on January 07, 2017, 01:07:39 AM
I'm really, really starting to dislike Petrov.  The man has a complete lack of class and respect.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: olaftab on January 07, 2017, 01:17:41 AM
With respect just fuck off Stiliyan.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 01:27:32 AM
That's pretty disappointing from Petrov.

Even worse, you know how this will go. The club will, quite rightly, tell him he's not particularly welcome at Bodymoor Heath if he intends to unsettle our players. The press will then lambast us for turning our back on our stricken former captain.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 07, 2017, 04:24:11 AM
Petrov really has handled himself very poorly recently.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: wittonwarrior on January 07, 2017, 05:41:55 AM
I will say it others will hesitate Petrov  is a bitter prick of the highest order.  For all the support he got from the Villa to act in this manner is an absolute disgrace.  Nothing more to say on the matter.  Goodnight - Come on the Villa.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 07, 2017, 06:22:30 AM
Exactly. We stuck by him as you would expect any club to do but now he's comes across as being bitter and resentful. Time for the club to say thanks but time to move on and away.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gerrin on January 07, 2017, 06:57:11 AM
Stan Petrov encouraging him to go to Rangers in the Meaning evil

Quote


Club legend Stiliyan Petrov says young Aston Villa striker Rushian Hepburn-Murphy should join Rangers for the sake of his career.

Hepburn-Murphy has been offered a new contract by Villa amid interest from Ibrox and he featured in the defeat at Cardiff City because boss Steve Bruce was told he was close to signing a huge new bumper deal.

But there has still been no breakthrough and Bruce has decided to withdraw the 18-year-old from the group ahead of the FA Cup third round trip to Tottenham on Sunday.

Petrov believes Rangers boss Mark Warburton should sign the youngster to help progress his career.

“Rushian is a very exciting young striker,” Petrov said. “He’s very quick and he would make a difference for Rangers.

“He’s one of those players that you love to have in the team but you hate to play against.

“He’s a very exciting young prospect and I would like to see Rushian moving away from Villa and having a chance somewhere to progress because he’s got tons of ability.

“He hasn’t asked me about Scotland, but I’m going in next week so we’ll probably have a conversation if he wants to know anything about it.”


Well Stan, if you learnt anything about Glasgow during your time there, you wouldn't be advising an 18 year old black kid to be going there as his first destination away from home. Why would an ex Celtic player be advising a player to join Rangers???
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on January 07, 2017, 07:25:29 AM
You cant buy class

As mr petrov is showing. An average player who the club bent over backwards to assist

To think some wanted him involved with the club as he would be a good role model  ::)
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mattjpa on January 07, 2017, 08:34:52 AM
Why is Stan getting involved? He may be bitter towards the club but he should remember that thousands of fans were behind him. Looking very petty at the moment
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rudy65 on January 07, 2017, 08:36:50 AM
I'm really, really starting to dislike Petrov.  The man has a complete lack of class and respect.

Why? Because of the RHM Rangers link?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rigadon on January 07, 2017, 09:56:48 AM
What are we offering him on length of contract and wages?

The most the club has ever offered any similar player apparently.

and what was that?

Not sure that's particularly relevant, either way I don't know and can't be arsed to check.  I'm utterly nonplussed about the whole thing.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2017, 10:01:39 AM
I really hate to see Stan getting abused. His recovery and the way we stuck by him was just about the only redeeming feature of the past horrible years. But while he might be having words put into his mouth, this isn't the first time something questionable has been attributed to him. I've no idea what he's really saying and why, and I hope there's no bitterness on his part, but I have a horrible feeling that we're on the road to an irrevocable split.

As for Rushian, I can see the attraction of Rangers - regular football in front of 40,000, decent money and the chance to play in Europe. I'm also perhaps seeing why three managers haven't given him a chance since his debut.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dekko on January 07, 2017, 10:08:59 AM
I really hate to see Stan getting abused. His recovery and the way we stuck by him was just about the only redeeming feature of the past horrible years. But while he might be having words put into his mouth, this isn't the first time something questionable has been attributed to him. I've no idea what he's really saying and why, and I hope there's no bitterness on his part, but I have a horrible feeling that we're on the road to an irrevocable split.

As for Rushian, I can see the attraction of Rangers - regular football in front of 40,000, decent money and the chance to play in Europe. I'm also perhaps seeing why three managers haven't given him a chance since his debut.

What else has he said?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Steve67 on January 07, 2017, 10:09:25 AM
Very balanced view Dave. I also wonder, if he was that good, he'd be getting in ahead of Agbonlahor, given how woeful he's been. I appreciate that Bruce may feel the kid isn't quite ready but patience is needed from both parties. If Stan HAS made those remarks, then he's out of order.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: charleeco7 on January 07, 2017, 10:10:20 AM
Stan come out saying he was talking about RHM going out on loan to Rangers. So he's either peddling backwards pretty fast or been done by the press.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on January 07, 2017, 10:11:13 AM
Stan says he meant on loan
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Steve67 on January 07, 2017, 10:15:57 AM
Been done by the press. They are pretty good at twisting peoples words. Thank goodness for that! Like Mr Woodhall, I too would hate to see Stan getting pelters.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on January 07, 2017, 10:27:58 AM
Stan says he meant on loan

Another misquote then apparently

make note to self dont talk to the press
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2017, 11:08:03 AM
I really hate to see Stan getting abused. His recovery and the way we stuck by him was just about the only redeeming feature of the past horrible years. But while he might be having words put into his mouth, this isn't the first time something questionable has been attributed to him. I've no idea what he's really saying and why, and I hope there's no bitterness on his part, but I have a horrible feeling that we're on the road to an irrevocable split.

As for Rushian, I can see the attraction of Rangers - regular football in front of 40,000, decent money and the chance to play in Europe. I'm also perhaps seeing why three managers haven't given him a chance since his debut.

What else has he said?

He's talked about being let go by Di Matteo without explanation a couple of times.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 07, 2017, 11:20:00 AM
Stan says he meant on loan

But he isnt up for loan by the club. Why is he even talking about him? Its none of Stans business and he is under no obligation to talk to the press at all.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: wittonwarrior on January 07, 2017, 11:24:32 AM
Luckily there isn't a like button for the threads otherwise I would spend  half my day liking peoples comments

Petrov handles himself extremely badly - I want nothing more to do with him in association with our great club.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on January 07, 2017, 11:53:47 AM
Stan says he meant on loan

But he isnt up for loan by the club. Why is he even talking about him? Its none of Stans business and he is under no obligation to talk to the press at all.

Exactly

After the snidiness when he wasnt offered a contract he should have learned to keep his gob shut and never recommend any more players to the club. In fact he doesnt need to be anywhere near the club
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john e on January 07, 2017, 12:19:03 PM
RHM is playing under a manager who hasn't got a great history of bringing youth through and prefers a fat Gabby on the pitch who he thinks is playing great football

there is no wonder why he's not signing any contract
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 12:31:22 PM
If Petrov has just got the wrong end of the stick, hadn't realised that his contract was due up and thought that we were considering a loan, it's not nearly as bad.

Hopefully it is just a misunderstanding and I'll choose to believe that because the alternative, that Petrov has become a cock, is unpleasant.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Neil Hawkes on January 07, 2017, 12:37:12 PM
RHM is playing under a manager who hasn't got a great history of bringing youth through and prefers a fat Gabby on the pitch who he thinks is playing great football

there is no wonder why he's not signing any contract
This is not aimed at you in particular but to everyone that keeps saying that. He has just taken a young goalkeeper on loan and has given good support to Jack. Maybe he hasn't played youths at other clubs because they weren't good enough.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KevinGage on January 07, 2017, 12:41:26 PM
Plus it is unlikely Warburton will be at Rangers long-term.

His stock as a manager is high. Do even vaguely well at Ibrox and -combined with his stint at Brentford- some of the bigger sides in the Championship or lower half of the Prem will no doubt be in for him.

If the Russian does well up there n'all, he'll most likely end up back down south in the not-too distant, maybe even with MW.

There's always a difference in playing for a manager who actively wants you compared to one who merely inherited you.

Not saying RHM is definitely away, but it's only right he weighs all this up. He'd prob have less to consider if he had been given even the occasional run-out against, oh, I dunno- B-lose, Brighton, Leedzzz and Norwich, for example.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: achilles on January 07, 2017, 12:50:20 PM
This is ridiculous, if he was that good, contract or no contract, Bruce would have played him!

He has potential at this point in time, that is all!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 12:50:30 PM
His stock isn't high. Rangers fans hate him because they're nowhere near Celtic in the league.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 12:52:08 PM
The only thing I can say in RHM's favour is that maybe he has heard Bruce's comments eulogising over that ****** Agbonlahor and decided he is never going to get a fair chance and would be better off elsewhere.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gerrin on January 07, 2017, 12:54:21 PM
RHM is playing under a manager who hasn't got a great history of bringing youth through and prefers a fat Gabby on the pitch who he thinks is playing great football

there is no wonder why he's not signing any contract

Bruce did a good job bringing Henderson through at Sunderland, making him a first team regular at 19.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 07, 2017, 12:55:52 PM
This is ridiculous, if he was that good, contract or no contract, Bruce would have played him!

He has potential at this point in time, that is all!
He was off injured for a few weeks at the back end of last year.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: FatSam on January 07, 2017, 01:03:04 PM
If Petrov has just got the wrong end of the stick, hadn't realised that his contract was due up and thought that we were considering a loan, it's not nearly as bad.

Hopefully it is just a misunderstanding and I'll choose to believe that because the alternative, that Petrov has become a cock, is unpleasant.
Agreed
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john e on January 07, 2017, 01:06:38 PM
This is ridiculous, if he was that good, contract or no contract, Bruce would have played him!

He has potential at this point in time, that is all!

so the fact that he is playing Gabby means he's good then
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KevinGage on January 07, 2017, 02:00:56 PM
His stock isn't high. Rangers fans hate him because they're nowhere near Celtic in the league.

Yes, they were really going to push Celtic close in their first season back, weren't they.

Most rational people (ie not Huns) might see 2nd in the top flight as progress, considering the shit state in which he found them.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 07, 2017, 02:01:17 PM
He needs to ask himself why if he is so good in his own mind at 18 is the only interest in his services coming from a club that had to reinvent itself in Scotland.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KevinGage on January 07, 2017, 02:07:01 PM
This is ridiculous, if he was that good, contract or no contract, Bruce would have played him!

He has potential at this point in time, that is all!

He has potential as well. But his actual contribution this season when he came on against Newcastle trumps anything Gabby has done over the past few games.

But then George Weah's 'cousin' who blagged a game for Southampton more than 10 years ago would offer more nuisance value than that useless bloater.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 03:39:33 PM
His stock isn't high. Rangers fans hate him because they're nowhere near Celtic in the league.

Yes, they were really going to push Celtic close in their first season back, weren't they.

Most rational people (ie not Huns) might see 2nd in the top flight as progress, considering the shit state in which he found them.

Fair enough. I'm basing his stock on the (unrealistic) opinions of Rangers fans. It's possible that outsiders might see what he's done there and think he's a decent manager.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 07, 2017, 06:32:25 PM
His stock isn't high. Rangers fans hate him because they're nowhere near Celtic in the league.

Have they missed the last 5 years or something?

Any Rangers fan who thought they could seriously challenge Celtic this season is very deluded....hardly any of the Rangers players would get in the Celtic team.

Them finishing above Aberdeen would be a good season.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 07, 2017, 06:44:43 PM
I never claimed that they're not deluded.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: The_ads on January 07, 2017, 10:09:07 PM
Two things to say on this.

Firstly Petrov is beginning to get right on my tits whether it's through social media, or talk sport,or the Mail. Seems to have an opinion on all things Aston Villa, and I genuinely laughed out loud when the mail labelled him a 'legend' - this bloke is bitter about not getting a contract. Misquoted or not, what the fuck has it got to do with him? 

Secondly, I won't lose a seconds sleep about this kid going to piss his career up the wall playing Hamilton away and playing second fiddle to Celtic forever.  Let him go, who cares. Sick of these players dictating, and at eighteen years old with zero starts who the fuck does he think he is? See ya
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 08, 2017, 12:02:28 AM
I still have a mental image of him coming on to make his debut and looking as if he was about to shit himself with nerves.

Surely someone can post the video of it on here?
i think it was away at Newcastle- he was shaking like a shitting dog. Came on for the last few minutes to waste a bit of time.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2017, 12:06:37 AM
Newcastle at home, the glorious 0-0! Which I wasn't at so no idea how he looked as I was at a Bromsgrove match.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2017, 12:10:42 AM
I honestly couldn't give a fuck - if he thinks he's better off elsewhere, then he should try his luck.

As for Petrov, as others have said, this isn't the first time we've heard stuff that we'd rather not hear from him.

This club has done lots of things really badly the last five or six years, but one thing they got absolutely right was how they handled Stan's illness. For him to start to act as he has since getting turned down for a contract would be really, really disappointing.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 08, 2017, 12:19:34 AM
I still have a mental image of him coming on to make his debut and looking as if he was about to shit himself with nerves.

Surely someone can post the video of it on here?
i think it was away at Newcastle- he was shaking like a shitting dog. Came on for the last few minutes to waste a bit of time.

His debut was against Sunderland, the season before last.  I think we were 4-0 up, and Sherwood brought him on for Benteke.

I think it's the last game Agbonlahor turned up for too.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 08, 2017, 12:23:33 AM
I think we should back off getting at Petrov. It's all ifs buts and maybes. He was our captain and a big character at a time when we had few on the pitch. He's entitled to comment on things if asked and we don't know what was genuinely said and what was taken out of context. Let's not become a Facebook type lynchmob.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: passport1 on January 08, 2017, 09:17:20 AM
". Let's not become a Facebook type lynchmob. "

Regrettably that horse has bolted.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: supertom on January 08, 2017, 12:16:09 PM
Journos ask Stan the questions, and he answers. Granted at his age he should be wily enough to know he'll get misquoted but I don't think Stan loiters outside the offices of the mail waiting for someone to come out and ask his opinion on something. He was asked because of his connection to Scotland. I'm getting fed up of hearing from him too to be honest, but when you're an ex footballer the last thing you want to do is to start avoiding the media. You take any given opportunity you can to stay within the footballing public eye and pray to the Sky gods that you'll get the odd punditry spot.
I genuinely hope he's not bitter about being turned down in the summer. He worked bloody hard but he must have known the chances were incredibly slim. At his age and after what he's gone through he'll do well to play sunday league every week, let alone the Championship.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Neil Hawkes on January 08, 2017, 12:29:50 PM
Also lets not forget that English is not his first language. I've lost count of the amount of arguments I have had with my Moldovan wife, who speaks 10 languages, only to find out in the end we both agreed on the same thing!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 08, 2017, 02:27:09 PM
Journos ask Stan the questions, and he answers. Granted at his age he should be wily enough to know he'll get misquoted but I don't think Stan loiters outside the offices of the mail waiting for someone to come out and ask his opinion on something. He was asked because of his connection to Scotland. I'm getting fed up of hearing from him too to be honest, but when you're an ex footballer the last thing you want to do is to start avoiding the media. You take any given opportunity you can to stay within the footballing public eye and pray to the Sky gods that you'll get the odd punditry spot.
I genuinely hope he's not bitter about being turned down in the summer. He worked bloody hard but he must have known the chances were incredibly slim. At his age and after what he's gone through he'll do well to play sunday league every week, let alone the Championship.
Given what we watched under a RdM, I'd imagine Stan would have been bewildered that he had been turned away.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: clash city rocker on January 08, 2017, 03:05:54 PM
Stan could say 10 things to a journalist of which 9 would be complimentary of the club. However the journalist will always pick the one thing that isn't quite as complimentary. Never talk to the press as they won't print what you say !
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: FatSam on January 08, 2017, 11:36:53 PM
I think we should back off getting at Petrov. It's all ifs buts and maybes. He was our captain and a big character at a time when we had few on the pitch. He's entitled to comment on things if asked and we don't know what was genuinely said and what was taken out of context. Let's not become a Facebook type lynchmob.
Seconded
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 09, 2017, 12:26:35 AM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robbo1874 on January 09, 2017, 01:31:53 AM
I think it's fair. Who knows what he did or didn't say? Something gets published and all of a sudden everyone is on his case. He's entitled to say what he thinks.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 09, 2017, 08:57:17 AM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Smith on January 09, 2017, 10:18:25 AM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

Precisely, it will make no difference to the outcome what Stan did or didn't say.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john e on January 09, 2017, 10:34:41 AM
I love Stan Petrov

  that is all
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bottom Right 89 on January 09, 2017, 01:11:06 PM
Everybody just needs to calm down over this Stan thing and show the same sort of class we treated him with during his illness. He's an honest guy and I doubt very much whatever he said was meant with malice towards the Villa.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Risso on January 09, 2017, 01:12:31 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 09, 2017, 05:06:46 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.
I suspect he hasn't got an encyclopedic knowledge of of youth team contract expiry dates at Villa.  And who knows what question was asked and how it was phrased.

I very much doubt Petrov would deliberately risk his relationship with Villa for something like this, so I'm prepared to accept it was a innocent mistake.  If you want to see the worst in everyone so be it. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Sexual Ealing on January 09, 2017, 05:09:59 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.

The paper that's unofficially known in Scotland as the Daily Ranger?!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 09, 2017, 05:12:45 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.

The paper that's unofficially known in Scotland as the Daily Ranger?!

And by Rangers fans as the Daily Rebel?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 09, 2017, 06:26:50 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.
I suspect he hasn't got an encyclopedic knowledge of of youth team contract expiry dates at Villa.  And who knows what question was asked and how it was phrased.

I very much doubt Petrov would deliberately risk his relationship with Villa for something like this, so I'm prepared to accept it was a innocent mistake.  If you want to see the worst in everyone so be it. 

Isn't there a bit of a jump from being a bit disappointed in Stan to "seeing the worst in everyone"?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Sexual Ealing on January 09, 2017, 06:29:42 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.

The paper that's unofficially known in Scotland as the Daily Ranger?!

And by Rangers fans as the Daily Rebel?

Ah, I didn't know that. I had no idea how biased my circle up there was towards the left foot!

Still, it's not hard to see why they might have an interest in piquing the interest of the Rangers fans.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 09, 2017, 06:58:33 PM
The characterisation of fans questioning why Petrov is off talking to the press about the club or its players as a "lynch mob" seems more than a bit overboard.

He shot his mouth off yet again and he knows better. Asking him to shut the hell up seems pretty reasonable. I dont see any of our other midfielders from his era off talking about us or causing trouble with our players contracts, why should he be?


The point is did he shoot his mouth off?  Or was he asked a question and innocently answered it?  Who wouldn't think a loan to Rangers would be a good move for the player?

When is RHM's contract up, soon isn't it, hence the requirement for a new one.  In what way then would a loan move be a good one?  The tone of his comments to the Scottish paper wasn't that it was a loan move, he just said it would be good for the lad to get away from Villa Park.  I also can't see that a Scottish paper would have any reason to misrepresent what he said, in any case.
I suspect he hasn't got an encyclopedic knowledge of of youth team contract expiry dates at Villa.  And who knows what question was asked and how it was phrased.

I very much doubt Petrov would deliberately risk his relationship with Villa for something like this, so I'm prepared to accept it was a innocent mistake.  If you want to see the worst in everyone so be it. 

Isn't there a bit of a jump from being a bit disappointed in Stan to "seeing the worst in everyone"?
Strange to pick up on that phraseology, but yeah, Risso does strike me as a pretty negative poster generally so no, it's not really such a huge leap if you want to take the wording literally.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 09, 2017, 09:32:19 PM
RHM scores from the spot to equalise 3-3 against smethwick.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: peter w on January 10, 2017, 10:00:25 AM
Is this your prediction for our title winning match and goal for next season?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 10, 2017, 10:06:17 AM
Nope - it was the score in the U23 match last night at Kidderminster. :-)
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdward on January 10, 2017, 10:11:14 AM
Is this your prediction for our title winning match and goal for next season?

U23s match from last night

Andre Green was a threat to the Baggies backline throughout while Rushian Hepburn-Murphy worked his way into numerous openings but could not find the target.

https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2017/01/09/west-brom-u23-away-report
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 10, 2017, 12:32:24 PM
Is this your prediction for our title winning match and goal for next season?

U23s match from last night

Andre Green was a threat to the Baggies backline throughout while Rushian Hepburn-Murphy worked his way into numerous openings but could not find the target.

https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2017/01/09/west-brom-u23-away-report
Given our lack of guile we should give both these kids an extended run in the team - Green, particularly, seems capable of getting beyond the fullback in a way that Adomah doesn't.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 10, 2017, 05:22:02 PM
The Stripy twat that works for me went and suggested RHM was very lively and the pick of our players.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 10, 2017, 05:35:41 PM
That's no way to talk about your subordinate - unless his twattishness is wholly correlated to his Stripyness.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 10, 2017, 05:50:46 PM
His twattishness knows no bounds. He is a particularly bitter fucker about the football though.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: manic-road on January 10, 2017, 06:12:16 PM
Is this your prediction for our title winning match and goal for next season?

U23s match from last night

Andre Green was a threat to the Baggies backline throughout while Rushian Hepburn-Murphy worked his way into numerous openings but could not find the target.

https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2017/01/09/west-brom-u23-away-report
Given our lack of guile we should give both these kids an extended run in the team - Green, particularly, seems capable of getting beyond the fullback in a way that Adomah doesn't.

I have seen Adomah get beyond a full back plenty of times.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 10, 2017, 06:53:13 PM
Is this your prediction for our title winning match and goal for next season?

U23s match from last night

Andre Green was a threat to the Baggies backline throughout while Rushian Hepburn-Murphy worked his way into numerous openings but could not find the target.

https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2017/01/09/west-brom-u23-away-report
Given our lack of guile we should give both these kids an extended run in the team - Green, particularly, seems capable of getting beyond the fullback in a way that Adomah doesn't.

I have seen Adomah get beyond a full back plenty of times.
Really?
He is too slow to get the ball in ... but then, that goes for several of our players. They all to want too long on the ball, apart from the Jedi who always looks for the first-time pass.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Nastylee on January 10, 2017, 09:23:48 PM
There's rarely anyone in the box to benefit from an early ball anyway. Maybe that's the reason deliveries are delayed.

As for RHM - I wonder if he will get the Delph treatment.

Delph - Signed a contract so we at least got a decent return albeit with a dubious end to his Villa career.
RHM - Refusing to extend his contract meaning the club could end up making a loss on his development with an estimated £200k expected by tribunal should he leave.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rudy65 on January 10, 2017, 09:35:40 PM
There's rarely anyone in the box to benefit from an early ball anyway. Maybe that's the reason deliveries are delayed.

As for RHM - I wonder if he will get the Delph treatment.

Delph - Signed a contract so we at least got a decent return albeit with a dubious end to his Villa career.
RHM - Refusing to extend his contract meaning the club could end up making a loss on his development with an estimated £200k expected by tribunal should he leave.

He will end up at Stevenage
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 16, 2017, 03:10:08 PM
Is it time to bite the bullet and bring him into the team, new contract or not?

I don't see any point in cutting off our nose to spite our face and if RHM can contribute more than Gabby, and it's hard to see how he couldn't, then shouldn't we just make use of the asset we are paying for whilst we still have him?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 16, 2017, 03:17:32 PM
He got injured for the U23's last week.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: aev on January 26, 2017, 11:59:01 AM
I saw something suggesting he was close to signing his new contract - not sure if anyone else has any more info?

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 26, 2017, 12:01:51 PM
Just read on reliable Twitter, that he posted something on instagram regarding signing a new contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villatillidie25 on January 26, 2017, 12:12:19 PM
wasn't his post more to do with him returning from injury or has he posted something more explicit now?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 26, 2017, 12:48:19 PM
It would be the icing on the cake on what has in truth been a superb transfer window to lock down RHM. We just need the results to turn for us now and with Kodjia also back this could be a fun second half to the season.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: footyskillz on January 26, 2017, 01:09:45 PM
Just read on reliable Twitter, that he posted something on instagram regarding signing a new contract.

Please can you quote what you read help us h and v on here.  Many thanks GSK
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 26, 2017, 07:47:42 PM
Sorry footy, im not on Instagram, it was posted on Twitter by ' The AVFC Faithful ' whoever they are.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 26, 2017, 08:10:09 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/AVFCLions/status/824579171426963456
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on January 26, 2017, 09:28:00 PM
I just read the link

Well that's cleared that up then . . .
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 26, 2017, 09:43:39 PM
Yes, I wouldn't call it conclusive evidence.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: chrisw1 on January 27, 2017, 09:48:17 AM
Hope he signs.  Even if it just means we get a fee at some point in the future.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mattjpa on February 03, 2017, 08:28:41 AM
Dr T has tweeted:

RHM has got a new got a new agent and has agreed terms but not penned deal yet.

Good news! happy friday...
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Jameson on February 03, 2017, 09:11:15 AM
Dr T has tweeted:

RHM has got a new got a new agent and has agreed terms but not penned deal yet.

Good news! happy friday...

Until he tweets in the terms of a mathematical equation most people haven't a hope in hell of understanding I refuse to believe it.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 03, 2017, 09:12:42 AM
Would be excellent news if he signs a new deal.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldtimernow on February 03, 2017, 09:33:19 AM
so we now have

DTA as well as ITSOP?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on February 03, 2017, 01:34:13 PM
On the verge of signing a new 3 year deal.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: frank black on February 03, 2017, 01:55:49 PM
Signed
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on February 03, 2017, 01:59:00 PM
Good lad you knew it made sense.  Fight for your place now son!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on February 03, 2017, 02:04:31 PM
Great news, hopefully can start to get on the bench and make an impact. Hopefully means the last we see of Gabby too.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: UK Redsox on February 03, 2017, 02:18:59 PM
SAATHAP

(https://d16b4kgyytl7c7.cloudfront.net/~/media/RHMContractMain.ashx?h=720&la=en&mw=1280&w=1280&vs=1&d=20170203T134327Z&hash=36149B82E4BBFDC03F07C94557340D6E45F0CD39)
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithe on February 03, 2017, 02:19:48 PM
How old is he?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 03, 2017, 02:21:03 PM
18.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 03, 2017, 02:21:27 PM
Great news, hopefully can start to get on the bench and make an impact. Hopefully means the last we see of Gabby too.

He's injured, at present. No idea how long for.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on February 03, 2017, 02:23:29 PM
It's the right decision. Now work hard young man. You'll get what you deserve if you do.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 03, 2017, 03:27:48 PM
No problem with Rushian's work rate.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on February 03, 2017, 05:09:04 PM
Great news, not least that it gives us another option up front!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KRS on February 03, 2017, 05:11:42 PM
Should expect to see him in the squad tomorrow then.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on February 03, 2017, 05:14:16 PM
Very happy he got rid of his agent and signed a new contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Exeter 77 on February 03, 2017, 05:48:16 PM
With Gabby out for a couple of months he will now, at least, should compete for a place on the bench with Keinan Davis.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on February 03, 2017, 06:03:47 PM
Should expect to see him in the squad tomorrow then.

Still injured. We only have two fit strikers!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on February 03, 2017, 08:17:15 PM
Is he definitely still injured?
 
Shame
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ian. on February 04, 2017, 10:33:59 AM
I missed this, cracking news that he's signed and also replaced his agent.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: achilles on February 04, 2017, 02:05:10 PM
Great news, hopefully can start to get on the bench and make an impact. Hopefully means the last we see of Gabby too.

He's injured, at present. No idea how long for.

Surprise, surprise, he doesn't sign until he gets injured, then all of a sudden he wants to sign a new contract?
I wonder how serious his injury is or perceived to be?
Loyalty don't make me laugh!

As long as we get some money for him when he gets himself fit and wants to piss off again!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tuscans on February 04, 2017, 02:07:30 PM
Don't get the big fuss
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Clampy on February 04, 2017, 02:08:13 PM
Great news, hopefully can start to get on the bench and make an impact. Hopefully means the last we see of Gabby too.

He's injured, at present. No idea how long for.

Surprise, surprise, he doesn't sign until he gets injured, then all of a sudden he wants to sign a new contract?
I wonder how serious his injury is or perceived to be?
Loyalty don't make me laugh!

As long as we get some money for him when he gets himself fit and wants to piss off again!

That's nonsense really isn't it? If he didn't want to stay, he wouldn't have signed a contract, injured or not.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 04, 2017, 02:11:55 PM
Great news, hopefully can start to get on the bench and make an impact. Hopefully means the last we see of Gabby too.

He's injured, at present. No idea how long for.

Surprise, surprise, he doesn't sign until he gets injured, then all of a sudden he wants to sign a new contract?
I wonder how serious his injury is or perceived to be?
Loyalty don't make me laugh!

As long as we get some money for him when he gets himself fit and wants to piss off again!

Hysterical nonsense.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on February 04, 2017, 02:21:46 PM
Clearly RHM was being influenced by an Agent with not necessarily the players interests at heart - resulting in RHM getting rid of him. As soon as he changes Agents he signs - any coincidence there??
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LukeJames on February 04, 2017, 03:02:53 PM
I think the original point was that Gabby is injured, not RHM.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villan For Life on February 04, 2017, 03:14:56 PM
Clearly RHM was being influenced by an Agent with not necessarily the players interests at heart - resulting in RHM getting rid of him. As soon as he changes Agents he signs - any coincidence there??

I'm sure I read that his father was acting for him previously.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 04, 2017, 04:47:06 PM
Whoever is his agent, I am delighted that we are keeping him.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on February 04, 2017, 04:53:41 PM
Clearly RHM was being influenced by an Agent with not necessarily the players interests at heart - resulting in RHM getting rid of him. As soon as he changes Agents he signs - any coincidence there??

I'm sure I read that his father was acting for him previously.

Don't listen to your Daddy, kids.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: GordonCowansisthegreatest on February 04, 2017, 05:06:12 PM
I think the original point was that Gabby is injured, not RHM.
RHM is injured and has been for a couple of weeks.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on February 20, 2017, 10:05:27 PM
Time for RHM to play? Hopefully he's fit?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Rigadon on February 20, 2017, 10:08:33 PM
He's likely to get his chance now.  Can't be less effective than his senior squad mates.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: villabear on February 20, 2017, 10:14:26 PM
Get him in the team with Green. If they don't get a few games now they'll be thinking WTF.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldhill_avfc on February 22, 2017, 03:19:41 PM
I don't see a lot in Green - for those who've seen him play in the juniors/reserves, what's his strengths?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villatillidie25 on February 22, 2017, 03:23:46 PM
I don't see a lot in Green - for those who've seen him play in the juniors/reserves, what's his strengths?

He's pretty raw, definitely, but is reasonably quick and has decent ball control/dribbling i'd say. Think the thing i've been most impressed is that, given his inexperience, he doesn't seem to give the ball away that much, which suggests he makes the right decision more often than others of his experience level. That said, long way to go
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: BOB MANSFIELD on February 22, 2017, 08:24:12 PM
You can't rely on kids to get us out of this division.........nor to keep us in it ! IMO
Give 'em some time when we are safe and sound...or has finally defeated the mathematics of promotion.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: frank black on February 22, 2017, 08:30:08 PM
You can't rely on kids to get us out of this division.........nor to keep us in it ! IMO
Give 'em some time when we are safe and sound...or has finally defeated the mathematics of promotion.

You sound like Alan Hansen. The older guys are letting us down.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: BOB MANSFIELD on February 22, 2017, 08:37:41 PM
Yes, I re-read that in a Scottish accent and you're right. But the kids he was decrying included some rather better players than Green, RHM , Davis and Sarkic etc IMHO
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on July 24, 2017, 04:56:08 PM
Where is he is pre season? I have not seen his name mentioned .....
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 24, 2017, 05:01:45 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: achilles on July 24, 2017, 05:14:05 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter

That is why he signed his new contract in the end because he knew he had a bad injury otherwise I doubt he would have signed it!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on July 24, 2017, 05:19:53 PM
Sounds about normal for a Villa player signing a contract - injured !!
Do we know how long he is out for ...guess if missing pre season its October at least ...would have been decent as someone coming off bench
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Clampy on July 24, 2017, 05:37:13 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter

That is why he signed his new contract in the end because he knew he had a bad injury otherwise I doubt he would have signed it!

Why would having a injury make any difference whether he'd signed a new contract or not?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: GordonCowansisthegreatest on July 24, 2017, 05:37:40 PM
Sounds about normal for a Villa player signing a contract - injured !!
Do we know how long he is out for ...guess if missing pre season its October at least ...would have been decent as someone coming off bench
Be like a new signing ;-)
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Percy McCarthy on July 24, 2017, 05:44:57 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter

That is why he signed his new contract in the end because he knew he had a bad injury otherwise I doubt he would have signed it!

Why would having a injury make any difference whether he'd signed a new contract or not?

He wants to get paid?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: achilles on July 24, 2017, 05:47:35 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter

That is why he signed his new contract in the end because he knew he had a bad injury otherwise I doubt he would have signed it!

Why would having a injury make any difference whether he'd signed a new contract or not?

If you remember he was haggling over a new deal and refused to sign a new contract but that all changed when he got injured!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Clampy on July 24, 2017, 05:58:25 PM
Injured and in recovery according to the good Doc on Twitter

That is why he signed his new contract in the end because he knew he had a bad injury otherwise I doubt he would have signed it!

Why would having a injury make any difference whether he'd signed a new contract or not?

If you remember he was haggling over a new deal and refused to sign a new contract but that all changed when he got injured!

How do you know he wouldn't have signed it if he wasn't injured? He has played since he signed the contract.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gareth on July 24, 2017, 06:09:50 PM
Ha, conspiracy theories are us :-)

Reality is at the end of last season Bruce said RHM and Green had long standing muscle injuries that needed rest, treatment and recuperation - I'd imagine RHM is taking a bit longer and the club are taking it easy with him.

Alternatively we could rush him back for preseason and risk him getting injured again straight away.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on July 24, 2017, 06:17:52 PM
Apparently he's likely to play in an under 23 game this week

On Green, I think it's his all round game (he's big and strong for a winger, fast, can score and take people on). I do agree that I'm not sure what he's oustnsinf at, if anything, and I think he's been mixed the last couple of games
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on July 25, 2017, 04:46:43 PM
Played today and scored ...will play at Tamworth on Friday also
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 28, 2017, 09:25:46 PM
Injured again and taken off early in tonight's game
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dave Cooper please on July 28, 2017, 11:47:59 PM
Injured again and taken off early in tonight's game

Tweeted after the game and didn't mention any injury so possibly just taken off as a precaution:

Quote
Rushian H-Murphy‏Verified account @Rushcmpt  2h2 hours ago
More
 Lovely 4-0 win against Tamworth! More minutes in the tank🦁⚡️💪🏾 #avfc
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: villan from luton on July 28, 2017, 11:49:06 PM
The evening mail bloke suggested he was taken off as arranged and nothing serious
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on July 29, 2017, 11:00:05 AM
Good to hear. Really have high hopes for this lad.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 29, 2017, 12:09:29 PM
Injured again and taken off early in tonight's game

Tweeted after the game and didn't mention any injury so possibly just taken off as a precaution:

Quote
Rushian H-Murphy‏Verified account @Rushcmpt  2h2 hours ago
More
 Lovely 4-0 win against Tamworth! More minutes in the tank🦁⚡️💪🏾 #avfc

That's good then. The original report had him injured. This kid needs a break to get back to full fitness.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on August 20, 2017, 12:10:59 PM
Surprised RHM wasn't on the bench yesterday? Especially with Hogan not 100%? Hope he starts against Wigan. RHM and Davis up front in a two would be interesting.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on August 20, 2017, 12:30:09 PM
Davis should not play on Tuesday ...keep him till Friday
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ozzjim on August 20, 2017, 02:22:51 PM
Davis is a must start in the league now, so unless Gallagher is in this week too, I would be wrapping him up a bit! Would like to see RHM get a start though in the cup.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 20, 2017, 03:41:00 PM
He's injured

Missed the u 23 game last week
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: jwarry on August 20, 2017, 04:04:46 PM
Not having a lot of luck is he? Shame because this is his chance to make a breakthrough.  Hope it doesn't pass him by.....
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mr underhill on August 20, 2017, 04:22:13 PM
is the geezer made of glass? thought he looked good when he came on in the cup game.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on August 20, 2017, 05:19:01 PM
What is the latest injury? Worrying amount of injuries for his age.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on September 02, 2017, 07:14:24 AM
Bruce said RHM is out until October with a thigh injury. Will we ever see him? Only 19 with so many injury problems is worrying.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mr underhill on September 02, 2017, 10:23:36 AM
The new Adama.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on September 03, 2017, 10:36:38 AM
This seems to happen with young very fast players I think

It is a concern
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on September 03, 2017, 11:25:15 AM
His style of play makes him vulnerable to injury.  He burrows into the situations where the skin and hair is flying.  Brave players get lots of knocks.  Yes Downing I am looking at you.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: passitsideways on September 03, 2017, 01:40:25 PM
Eh, I'd rather have someone less brave who stays on the pitch than someone whose feats of bravery constantly lead him to the physio's table.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on September 03, 2017, 02:17:37 PM
I have seen a lot of Villa players  over a a lot of years and I rate him. No more than that and no less.  It's not about bravery per se, it is about combativity.  Maybe he will make it.  Maybe he won't.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on September 03, 2017, 02:26:45 PM
He need to get his body in fighting shape for football and need to be smarter in protecting himself. Perhaps he need to take up Martial Art to tough up his body and legs.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on September 03, 2017, 02:47:59 PM
You could have a good point there SPA.  A player needs to learn to use a less breakable bit of his body to bunt an opponent.  Why stick in your foot with its breakable bones when you can use your arse.  See Carew, J.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on September 03, 2017, 09:17:07 PM
His style of play makes him vulnerable to injury.  He burrows into the situations where the skin and hair is flying.  Brave players get lots of knocks.  Yes Downing I am looking at you.

Maybe he needs to be smarter, not just to have a long career but any career at all. I don't want my skill players throwing them into situations like you've described. I'd rather see the likes of Downing* or RHM setting up or scoring goals.

* off course I'd now like to see Downing on top of a pile of burning tires but my point remains
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brontebilly on September 04, 2017, 06:07:02 PM
Badly needs a spell on loan somewhere to get first team football experience. Fairly pointless playing u23 games
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on September 19, 2017, 09:28:22 PM
How much longer is he out? I don't think I've ever seen a clear statement
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on September 19, 2017, 09:30:35 PM
Bruce said he's got a thigh injury. Back in October I think.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villafirst on October 29, 2017, 03:07:18 PM
Nearly November - where is RHM??
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mr underhill on October 29, 2017, 04:48:11 PM
does he actually exist in real time?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Des Little on October 29, 2017, 05:04:39 PM
Bruce said he's got a thigh injury. Back in October I think.

2019?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: TheMalandro on October 29, 2017, 05:16:26 PM
It must have been hard to diagnose. Perhaps, lupus or sarcoidosis.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Breezeblock on October 30, 2017, 05:14:46 PM
It must have been hard to diagnose. Perhaps, lupus or sarcoidosis.
It's never Lupus! Check his eyes for Kayser–Fleischer rings!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Leicester_Villian on October 30, 2017, 06:36:27 PM
Must admit I had forgot about him ...... he is injured more than Gabby
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on October 30, 2017, 07:00:36 PM
He's out with a hamstring injury. To have as many injuries as he's having at his age doesn't really bode well.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ian. on October 30, 2017, 08:28:10 PM
Nearly November - where is RHM??
He has gone away on a pilgrimage, not to find himself but to finally find out why Barry didn’t take the penalty.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Des Little on October 30, 2017, 09:21:07 PM
He’s had more injuries than than Evil Kenievel that lad. He makes Nathan Baker look like Robocop.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ChicagoLion on October 30, 2017, 09:40:24 PM
Nearly November - where is RHM??
He has gone away on a pilgrimage, not to find himself but to finally find out why Barry didn’t take the penalty.
Ho Ho Ho.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: olaftab on October 30, 2017, 09:44:09 PM
No need to rushian him back...sorry




I will leave right away.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on October 30, 2017, 09:46:05 PM
He’s had more injuries than than Evil Kenievel that lad. He makes Nathan Baker look like Robocop.
r

Protect the innocent, hoof the ball.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on October 30, 2017, 11:06:45 PM
How many games did he play under Steve Bruce ?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on October 30, 2017, 11:12:59 PM
He came on as a sub at Fulham.

Really struggling to recall another game, Cardiff?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on October 31, 2017, 12:17:24 AM
Approx 20 mins at Colchester this season. Last season it was approx 15 mins at Fulham, 10 at Cardiff, and 5 mins at home to Newcastle under RDM.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on October 31, 2017, 12:36:46 AM
He's not tweeted in a few weeks.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on October 31, 2017, 09:44:42 AM
If he is NFL player he would got cut.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gareth on October 31, 2017, 09:53:57 AM
He’s also 19 years old, the club doctors will be in charge of his health, not every kid is ready at 17 like Rooney was.  Better 6-8-12 months sorting out muscular injuries now rather than play 2-3 games be out for a month, play 2-3 games etc
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: The Edge on October 31, 2017, 10:38:07 AM
Omg I completely forgot about RHM! He's completely fell off the radar. The club and his dodgy agent spent what seemed like forever agreeing a new deal then he promptly done a disappearing act. Strange one this.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Chris Jameson on October 31, 2017, 10:40:05 AM
If he is NFL player he would got cut.

I don't follow American sports but that sounds quite brutal.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: in exile on November 06, 2017, 10:29:40 PM
Back in training today
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: tomd2103 on November 07, 2017, 12:04:12 AM
Omg I completely forgot about RHM! He's completely fell off the radar. The club and his dodgy agent spent what seemed like forever agreeing a new deal then he promptly done a disappearing act. Strange one this.

Not really.  He's had injury problems and in his absence the likes of Davis and O'Hare have really prospered. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on November 07, 2017, 07:59:18 AM
How do you justify the description of his agent being "dodgy"?  Perhaps there is evidence of such a description.  If not it is litigious thin ice best not ventured on.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ads on November 07, 2017, 08:44:45 AM
Could be the injection of pace we're looking for. Hopefully on the bench against QPR.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Drummond on November 07, 2017, 10:45:59 AM
Could be the injection of pace we're looking for. Hopefully on the bench against QPR.

It's nice to think there's him and Green to come back and give us more energy.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: darren woolley on November 07, 2017, 11:13:03 AM
Nice to have him back a fit RHM can only be good for the team.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: TheMalandro on November 07, 2017, 11:17:44 AM
He has to get ahead of Samba first.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Hookeysmith on November 07, 2017, 01:01:20 PM
Before we pin our season hopes on a kid that has featured very little and has scored zero 1st team goals I would ease caution

He is one of the few players that gets better the less they play - I have seen not a great deal to be excited about yet with him
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ads on November 07, 2017, 01:48:24 PM
Whose pinning hopes? He looks a good player and I'd like him in the squad to develop, like Davis, because I think he will offer us something.

If you weren't at Sunderland or Cardiff, you wont have seen anything.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Brend'Watkins on November 07, 2017, 02:17:34 PM
I haven't seen much of him either but what I have I have been impressed with. He puts in a shift, has pace and an eye for goal. Hogan or a fit RHM? Half a RHM would be more productive.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: olaftab on November 07, 2017, 02:44:05 PM
Is this another case where injured players somehow become supermen?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on November 07, 2017, 07:55:27 PM
Is this another case where injured players somehow become supermen?
Before we pin our season hopes on a kid that has featured very little and has scored zero 1st team goals I would ease caution

He is one of the few players that gets better the less they play - I have seen not a great deal to be excited about yet with him

Going to combine this, both posts are grossly unfair, literally no one is calling him a saviour or superman, or anything like that.  However anyone who has seen him at any level can tell you he is quick and busy.  If he can bring that into the first team it does give us a different option up front and, with Hogan looking more and more like a terrible signing, we desperately need that right now.  He scored 7 in 12 for the reserves last year despite his injuries, it's not the sort of record that forces him into starting for the first team but it's enough to be worth a look and that's what people are wanting.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brontebilly on November 07, 2017, 09:06:54 PM
Is this another case where injured players somehow become supermen?
Before we pin our season hopes on a kid that has featured very little and has scored zero 1st team goals I would ease caution

He is one of the few players that gets better the less they play - I have seen not a great deal to be excited about yet with him

Going to combine this, both posts are grossly unfair, literally no one is calling him a saviour or superman, or anything like that.  However anyone who has seen him at any level can tell you he is quick and busy.  If he can bring that into the first team it does give us a different option up front and, with Hogan looking more and more like a terrible signing, we desperately need that right now.  He scored 7 in 12 for the reserves last year despite his injuries, it's not the sort of record that forces him into starting for the first team but it's enough to be worth a look and that's what people are wanting.

He needs a run of first team games on loan quickly, cant understand why the club arent making it happen. U23 and reserve games are relatively pointless. RHM looks very raw to me, Davis at least can physically compete .
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on November 07, 2017, 09:38:58 PM
I agree playing for our reserves/U23s is relatively pointless because they play such a different way that it's practically another sport, that one of the reasons, in my eyes, that we have  such a tough time transitioning the kids into the first team and so many leave us and then do well somewhere else.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on November 08, 2017, 12:55:02 AM
Whose pinning hopes? He looks a good player and I'd like him in the squad to develop, like Davis, because I think he will offer us something.

If you weren't at Sunderland or Cardiff, you wont have seen anything.

Home to Newcastle too, came on and looked lively. Ayew spark and a Tish equaliser, all seems a long while ago now.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ROBBO on November 08, 2017, 05:36:09 AM
Surely Hogan will not be starting next game. I would prefer Samba up front.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Drummond on November 08, 2017, 03:50:45 PM
Surely Hogan will not be starting next game. I would prefer Samba up front.

At least he scores.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: UK Redsox on January 06, 2018, 02:42:18 PM
I always thought he was Rush-Ian but the PA bloke just called him Ru-Sian

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 06, 2018, 02:45:22 PM
I always thought he was Rush-Ian but the PA bloke just called him Ru-Sian



It’s a daft name however it’s pronounced.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: footyskillz on August 15, 2018, 07:41:26 AM
Well I'm happy he got his first ever start and actually felt it was very tough for him in the way villa played v yeovil.

I don't think set up was right and RHM was up against the tallest player ever and others who seemed to dominate him physically .

Felt Bruce was loathe to play the youngers and his comments after were telling .

I think constantly RHM didn't have support and yes he fluffed his main chance but I would certainly keep him involved however if we get a loan of say Abrahams then we would loan him away maybe to even someone like Yeovil

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on August 15, 2018, 07:43:41 AM
You're right Skillz, he was isolated and had no support, the ball was launched in the air to him constantly. He did miss a great chance but the lad needs more minutes.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ROBBO on August 15, 2018, 07:47:04 AM
Either the player marking him is a giant or RHM is on the small side to lead the line. We really need a target up front.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Steve67 on August 15, 2018, 07:55:05 AM
He needs to cut his teeth and go out on loan to learn more about big boys football.  He will be playing against Hulk and Collosas on a weekly basis and will have to learn how to combat this.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: footyskillz on August 15, 2018, 07:57:12 AM
You're right Skillz, he was isolated and had no support, the ball was launched in the air to him constantly. He did miss a great chance but the lad needs more minutes.

Gsk I fear Bruce kinda put him in under a guide of giving youth a chance if they don't score 3 then it proves there not ready.

I hope he gets minutes some where down the line. Showered flashes of skillz and play just having his first start is wonderful for him and maybe he would have played the 90 if we were leading

He and Doyle Hayes were first to go off proved 'correct' but if he was on with JK and JG then he may have been scoring that goal or getting chances
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on August 15, 2018, 08:01:45 AM
After reading SB comments after the game, I'd say you're definitely right Skillz.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 15, 2018, 08:02:47 AM
Needs a loan - once we've got cover

He does face a fairly big challenge. Most teams do play with one up front now. He's always going to find that really difficult. His type is pretty rare nowadays - unless you're so good that you can play for an elite side like man city

I think he might need to learn to play wide in a three
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: footyskillz on August 15, 2018, 08:12:24 AM
He could be Sterling esque but I think Bruce fundamentally likes the bigger burlers build rather than the technical side .
He doesn't suit Bruce style of play and RHM probably needs a loan regardless of incomings .
In some ways a good manager would adapt the play and systems to suit the players he has .

Greeny is another who could be used up top or off striker .

Brucey seems not to trust anything but experience which isn't on really .

Yes there is strong case for tried and tested and Bruce himself is tried and tested but he won't risk much I guess because he believes in his methods .
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 15, 2018, 08:14:50 AM
He's looked good off the bench so far

I'd hoped yday might have boosted his confidence, but I suspect it may have done the opposite
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave shelley on August 15, 2018, 08:40:35 AM
I posted on the match thread last night that the one person most likely to benefit from the introduction of Jack was RHM and what did Bruce do? Took him off!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: RussellC on August 15, 2018, 08:44:34 AM
Really felt for him last night. I've always thought that being a loan-striker must be the most unemployable way of playing football. You basically spent the entirety of the match chasing lost causes and being battered by the opposition centre-backs. I can only assume that Bruce wanted to provide RHM with experience of that, as using him in that formation last night really provided no other purpose. IMO, it would have been much more effective to have played him wide and asked Adomah to play through the middle.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Richard on August 15, 2018, 08:48:02 AM
A lot of teams play only one up top though and it works for them - it's all about the support from the flanks and the midfielders none of which happened last night.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: RussellC on August 15, 2018, 08:51:38 AM
A lot of teams play only one up top though and it works for them - it's all about the support from the flanks and the midfielders none of which happened last night.

But how many of them are 5ft 8" 19 year-olds? And in fairness to the wingers, he was teed-up at least once by Green, only to fluff his lines.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on August 15, 2018, 11:33:57 PM
At least once and at most once. This kid has a lot in his locker and we need to give him a decent run of games to show that.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bermuda Villa on August 16, 2018, 12:59:57 AM
Sadly he wont give him a run of games because he wants to show the owners he needs some loanees in, his interview last night was stage managed to put maximum pressure on them.

However whichever players he gets in Bruce will not play to their strengths which is highlighted by the way he has used Hogan since he was signed. He works so hard running the channels but the only player capable of finding him his is Jack and hopefully now McGinn. I just find it bizarre that we scout a player, sign them and ignore what made them a success in the first place. Sadly Bruce wants an old fashioned target man to hold the ball up which makes Davis absence since he broke through even more baffling.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: RussellC on August 16, 2018, 10:25:29 AM
If I'm honest, and this is an isolated exception, I actually feel a bit for Bruce with this one.  Hepburn-Murphy is undoubtedly a talented player for his age and we'd all love to see him progress into the first-team. Would I be happy to put my faith in him for the remainder of this season and not bring-in another striker? Absolutely not. For all of Bruce's unhelpful tactics, Tuesday night highlighted RHM's limitations at this stage. He's tiny. Really tiny, and easily bullied by centre-halves. Even in wide-areas he was unable to get past his marker/s and was generally ineffective. Regardless of his record at U23 / Youth Team level I've seen absolutely nothing in his first-team appearances YET to suggest that he's ready to be n the first-team, even as a regular on the bench.

We can all point the finger at Bruce for not developing him, but he's also been hampered by his own injury record. Bruce's remit is one thing and one thing only - to get us promoted. If bringing through youth-team players contributes towards that, then brilliant, but it's also down to those players to grab that opportunity. At the moment I've not seen RHM do any more than the likes of Luke and Stefan Moore did at a similar stage.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Risso on August 16, 2018, 10:37:02 AM
Luke Moore did a lot more to be honest.  At one stage he looked a very good player indeed.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Brend'Watkins on August 16, 2018, 10:41:13 AM
What surprised me most in the first half was how poor his first touch was when balls were played into him.  Nothing stuck.  He wasn't alone in that mind. In fact, thinking about it the pitch looked very dry making the ball less easy to control.  I want to see more of RHM because he has showed that he can play in patches previously.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on August 16, 2018, 10:53:11 AM
Luke Moore did a lot more to be honest.  At one stage he looked a very good player indeed.

Moore looked very good for the 2nd half of DOLs last season and for a few months after mon arrived (when he was playing on the left of a 3) but he picked up an injury in about November and never got back from it because Young came in and replaced him. I think going to the baggies then ruined him and he's never got back to even the level he was in that first year or so let alone lived up to his potential.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on August 16, 2018, 02:26:44 PM
Is he even playing anymoore?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on August 16, 2018, 02:31:43 PM
Luke Moore did a lot more to be honest.  At one stage he looked a very good player indeed.

Moore looked very good for the 2nd half of DOLs last season and for a few months after mon arrived (when he was playing on the left of a 3) but he picked up an injury in about November and never got back from it because Young came in and replaced him. I think going to the baggies then ruined him and he's never got back to even the level he was in that first year or so let alone lived up to his potential.
He had a decent spell at Swansea IIRC.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 16, 2018, 02:36:17 PM
I do think RHM has a good touch - I've seen it before

But it's just not tested at under 23 level where there's so much time and space

Similarly I think JDH is a talented passer. But the extra pressure on the ball on Tuesday meant that he was invariably passing backwards and sideways
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: yammers on August 17, 2018, 11:44:35 AM
If I'm honest, and this is an isolated exception, I actually feel a bit for Bruce with this one.  Hepburn-Murphy is undoubtedly a talented player for his age and we'd all love to see him progress into the first-team. Would I be happy to put my faith in him for the remainder of this season and not bring-in another striker? Absolutely not. For all of Bruce's unhelpful tactics, Tuesday night highlighted RHM's limitations at this stage. He's tiny. Really tiny, and easily bullied by centre-halves. Even in wide-areas he was unable to get past his marker/s and was generally ineffective. Regardless of his record at U23 / Youth Team level I've seen absolutely nothing in his first-team appearances YET to suggest that he's ready to be n the first-team, even as a regular on the bench.

We can all point the finger at Bruce for not developing him, but he's also been hampered by his own injury record. Bruce's remit is one thing and one thing only - to get us promoted. If bringing through youth-team players contributes towards that, then brilliant, but it's also down to those players to grab that opportunity. At the moment I've not seen RHM do any more than the likes of Luke and Stefan Moore did at a similar stage.

This!

 I don’t think he’s as good as we all want him to be.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 17, 2018, 06:56:28 PM
Yeovil were extremely dominant physically so other opponents may be less problematic for him

But I do think it's hard to see how such a midget can be a number 9 in the modern game
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on August 17, 2018, 07:08:42 PM
Nobody is a bigger fan of RHM than I am but I was really amazed to see him beaten one on one in a foot race against Wigan.  He is either not as good  as I thought he is or he is not fully fit.  I hope it is the latter.



Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldhill_avfc on August 17, 2018, 07:28:08 PM
Possibly both?


I haven't seen him in the U23s and in a somewhat counter intuitive way I think it helps make a clearer judgement.

There haven't been (m)any players I've seen down the years who prove you wrong based on your initial views.  It's not that you expect young players to have great games but you do expect them to show something that makes you think that they've got promise.

As somebody said earlier the U23s don't really matter that much.  Here, now and in his other 1st team appearances I haven't seen much cause for optimism.

By the same token, I think Green has shown glimpses of what he may be able to do given a clear run from injuries - although with him I suspect that once injury prone, always injury prone, and unfortunately in the end won't amount to much either.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Nelson Lodge on August 17, 2018, 08:02:00 PM
Yeovil were extremely dominant physically so other opponents may be less problematic for him

But I do think it's hard to see how such a midget can be a number 9 in the modern game


He seems to have 2 heights! Depending on the source (googled his name with question for height) he is either 1.73 metres (5ft 8 inches) or 1.87 metres (6ft 1.5 inches).
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 17, 2018, 09:20:29 PM
Well he definitely isn't over 6 foot is he
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on August 18, 2018, 12:02:51 AM
Well he definitely isn't over 6 foot is he

He is, he's just far away.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: villan from luton on August 18, 2018, 12:45:46 AM
It is a big step up for the lad, but he was being pumped up long balls to the centre halves. How did we score our goal? A cracking ball into space and good skills then by Kodjia. Instead of slagging off the kids, give them the chance to play alongside the real players in the team. I have to say the manager has gone even more down in my estimation with his comments about the youngsters, And as for the comment about the keeper, I will reserve judgement but he bottled that one on one big time
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on August 18, 2018, 09:52:17 AM
I've read a lot of people criticising Bruce's post match comments. Perhaps they would prefer a manager to say something like "We were excellent", when actually we were poor?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: adrenachrome on August 18, 2018, 10:02:21 AM
I've read a lot of people criticising Bruce's post match comments. Perhaps they would prefer a manager to say something like "We were excellent", when actually we were poor?

I take your point, but there must Shirley be an alternative to the polarities of Lambobull and Bruciebull. Something like the truth, maybe.

The truth will set you free.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on August 18, 2018, 03:32:04 PM
I've read a lot of people criticising Bruce's post match comments. Perhaps they would prefer a manager to say something like "We were excellent", when actually we were poor?

He said we were poor, if he'd left it at that no one would've had a problem, but saying the kids struggled because they weren't used to real football was the bit people didn't like.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldhill_avfc on August 18, 2018, 07:53:11 PM
It's true though, isn't it?

It's massive step up from U23 to 1st team football - that's why so many teams send their players out on loan to div 1 & 2 teams.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bermuda Villa on August 18, 2018, 09:15:03 PM
Its true if you never play them and integrate them slowly. Davis did not do too bad when he came through last season but we virtually never saw him after Christmas think about chances last season when he couls have given run outs to Green, RHM, JDH, Davis and O'Hare or at the very least keep them involved with the first team squad and give them a cameo here and there. Instead we get to play other peoples loanees and give them the experience.

That to me just sums up that he is not trying to build anything but just wants a short term fix.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: WarszaVillan on August 18, 2018, 09:25:12 PM
Green, RHM and Davis were basically injured for the second half of the sea
Its true if you never play them and integrate them slowly. Davis did not do too bad when he came through last season but we virtually never saw him after Christmas think about chances last season when he couls have given run outs to Green, RHM, JDH, Davis and O'Hare or at the very least keep them involved with the first team squad and give them a cameo here and there. Instead we get to play other peoples loanees and give them the experience.

That to me just sums up that he is not trying to build anything but just wants a short term fix.



Hepburn-Murphy and Green were injured for most of last season and Davis from March onwards.

Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldhill_avfc on August 18, 2018, 09:37:42 PM
If the other clubs loanees was a reference to Onamah then I'd say Bruce was right to play him.  I actually thought he was a decent player and was in the team on merit on the occasions he played - not just to give hm game time at the expense of the other players mentioned.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brontebilly on August 18, 2018, 10:19:37 PM
Its true if you never play them and integrate them slowly. Davis did not do too bad when he came through last season but we virtually never saw him after Christmas think about chances last season when he couls have given run outs to Green, RHM, JDH, Davis and O'Hare or at the very least keep them involved with the first team squad and give them a cameo here and there. Instead we get to play other peoples loanees and give them the experience.

That to me just sums up that he is not trying to build anything but just wants a short term fix.

Green and RHM were injured at the back end of last season. Davis got plenty of chancesThe only hard luck story of that crew really is O'Hare who got very limited chances and by all accounts wasn't allowed go on loan either. The reality is loanees like Snodgrass were vastly superior to some of the options above, though Bruce should certainly have rotated a lot more last season.

To be honest I wouldn't see the job of the manager to build anything long term, that should be the responsibility of the CEO or director of football.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on August 18, 2018, 11:10:48 PM
Tell that to Pochetinno
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on August 19, 2018, 12:35:49 AM
Its true if you never play them and integrate them slowly. Davis did not do too bad when he came through last season but we virtually never saw him after Christmas think about chances last season when he couls have given run outs to Green, RHM, JDH, Davis and O'Hare or at the very least keep them involved with the first team squad and give them a cameo here and there. Instead we get to play other peoples loanees and give them the experience.

That to me just sums up that he is not trying to build anything but just wants a short term fix.

Green and RHM were injured at the back end of last season. Davis got plenty of chancesThe only hard luck story of that crew really is O'Hare who got very limited chances and by all accounts wasn't allowed go on loan either. The reality is loanees like Snodgrass were vastly superior to some of the options above, though Bruce should certainly have rotated a lot more last season.

To be honest I wouldn't see the job of the manager to build anything long term, that should be the responsibility of the CEO or director of football.

The bold bit is the key.  I don't think anyone is wanting 5-6 of the kids to start 30-40 games but to have 20-30 minutes fairly regularly because not only does it give them the experience they need but it also means you not flogging the life out of the senior players.

Aside from that any manager who isn't thinking of 2-3 seasons at a club is a charlatan who knows he'll only last as long as it takes the board to figure him out.  On that basis we should be seeing now work done by Bruce in the first few months to make sure the kids were learning to play a way that would benefit the first team. Bruce has never done that, he has no record of dragging a kid from the academy up so they become a top player.  He can recognise a player with ability when it's in front of him, even if they're young, but he can't, for example, watch a  young winger and think "I'd make a good full back out of him".

One of the things people like about him is the supposed honesty but I think that's mostly just because he sees the game the same way a fan does so people hear him echoing what they thought. The problem is that he just can't do anything about it beyond buying in players that someone else has developed.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: robleflaneur on August 19, 2018, 01:00:12 AM
Its true if you never play them and integrate them slowly. Davis did not do too bad when he came through last season but we virtually never saw him after Christmas think about chances last season when he couls have given run outs to Green, RHM, JDH, Davis and O'Hare or at the very least keep them involved with the first team squad and give them a cameo here and there. Instead we get to play other peoples loanees and give them the experience.

That to me just sums up that he is not trying to build anything but just wants a short term fix.

Green and RHM were injured at the back end of last season. Davis got plenty of chancesThe only hard luck story of that crew really is O'Hare who got very limited chances and by all accounts wasn't allowed go on loan either. The reality is loanees like Snodgrass were vastly superior to some of the options above, though Bruce should certainly have rotated a lot more last season.

To be honest I wouldn't see the job of the manager to build anything long term, that should be the responsibility of the CEO or director of football.

The bold bit is the key.  I don't think anyone is wanting 5-6 of the kids to start 30-40 games but to have 20-30 minutes fairly regularly because not only does it give them the experience they need but it also means you not flogging the life out of the senior players.

Aside from that any manager who isn't thinking of 2-3 seasons at a club is a charlatan who knows he'll only last as long as it takes the board to figure him out.  On that basis we should be seeing now work done by Bruce in the first few months to make sure the kids were learning to play a way that would benefit the first team. Bruce has never done that, he has no record of dragging a kid from the academy up so they become a top player.  He can recognise a player with ability when it's in front of him, even if they're young, but he can't, for example, watch a  young winger and think "I'd make a good full back out of him".

One of the things people like about him is the supposed honesty but I think that's mostly just because he sees the game the same way a fan does so people hear him echoing what they thought. The problem is that he just can't do anything about it beyond buying in players that someone else has developed.
I think it's important that a manager thinks long term,otherwise ,unless you are a Citeh ,Chelsea or Man Ure,there is no sustainability.The big difference between SGT and MON.The latter's approach was let someone else deal with the consequences  of overspending at clubs like Leicester,Celtic and Villa.
SGT valued the construction of a firm base and a good youth policy.
With Bruce,it's give me a team that should get promoted but don't expect me to go any further.Has he got any outsiders promoted ?Did he leave any of his teams in good shape ? Wigan were always a small club but had some financial backing.
Sunderland,Hull and ,yes,Blues were teams with unrealised potential.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on August 19, 2018, 07:48:45 AM
Well he definitely isn't over 6 foot is he

He is, he's just far away.
doesnt anybody stay in one place any more?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: footyskillz on September 01, 2018, 10:09:20 AM
Place on bench at best for RHM today and hopefully some minutes

Would like to see him get opportunity to play but as he didn't score 10 goals against Burton he won't be starting .

And moving forward he will have lost some match time with Abrahams coming in both are 20 years old though
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on September 01, 2018, 11:47:19 AM
Place on bench at best for RHM today and hopefully some minutes

Would like to see him get opportunity to play but as he didn't score 10 goals against Burton he won't be starting .

And moving forward he will have lost some match time with Abrahams coming in both are 20 years old though

Yes, both 20 and one has shown he can score and be a starter and the other hasn't. Yet.

RHM should probably go out on loan once Davis and/or Hogan are match fit.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Nastylee on September 01, 2018, 12:21:11 PM
This is it - We all go on about our youngsters but Abraham has scored 20+ goals. RHM looks lost most of the time with a few flashes. Think about what Rooney, Owen and co were doing at 17 and Villa fans cry over Green going on loan when the reality is he's managed a handful of promising performances and has a terrible injury record. We seem to put our youngsters on a pedestal without any substance to back it up. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: old man villa fan on September 01, 2018, 01:51:13 PM
This is it - We all go on about our youngsters but Abraham has scored 20+ goals. RHM looks lost most of the time with a few flashes. Think about what Rooney, Owen and co were doing at 17 and Villa fans cry over Green going on loan when the reality is he's managed a handful of promising performances and has a terrible injury record. We seem to put our youngsters on a pedestal without any substance to back it up.

Young players should be integrated into the match day squad. They are not all obvious stand out talents ( who only come along once in a blue moon anyway). Integration means developing them smoothly, not throwing them in, ditching them, bringing them back again in a haphazard way.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on September 01, 2018, 02:07:55 PM
Owen and Rooney were pretty unique I think. I agree with you Old Man, they shouldn't be ditched at the first sign of trouble like Green has been.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on September 01, 2018, 02:17:19 PM
Rush is on the bench again today. With Hogan, Tammy and Davis yet to feature this season he'll do well to stay in the match-day 18. Really hope he comes off the bench to make a telling impression soon. Today would be great.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kieron on January 11, 2019, 02:36:55 PM
Calderwood takes RHM on loan.


https://twitter.com/AVFCOfficial/status/1083725480136753155

".@Rushcmpt has joined @CambridgeUtdFC on loan until the end of the season ✍️

Full story 👉 https://bit.ly/2Fqa5CE"
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 11, 2019, 03:05:29 PM
Hopefully a good move for him, he needs game at first team level, if he can get 15ish starts and scores some goals then it'll be huge for his confidence. He's easily good enough to score goals at that level. My only concern isthat I'd have preferred him joining some chasing promotion than battling relegation.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: tomd2103 on January 11, 2019, 03:30:38 PM
Hopefully a good move for him, he needs game at first team level, if he can get 15ish starts and scores some goals then it'll be huge for his confidence. He's easily good enough to score goals at that level. My only concern isthat I'd have preferred him joining some chasing promotion than battling relegation.

Agree Paul.  Hopefully he can stay fit for the rest of the season and have a good run of games.  I like the look of what I have seen of him so far, but not sure he is suited to playing up front on his own really.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 11, 2019, 04:46:13 PM
Hopefully a good move for him, he needs game at first team level, if he can get 15ish starts and scores some goals then it'll be huge for his confidence. He's easily good enough to score goals at that level. My only concern isthat I'd have preferred him joining some chasing promotion than battling relegation.

Agree Paul.  Hopefully he can stay fit for the rest of the season and have a good run of games.  I like the look of what I have seen of him so far, but not sure he is suited to playing up front on his own really.

From what I've seen of Brentford Smith has never seemed to use out and out wingers who stay wide and get crosses in but instead has players on the left and right who have the freedom to be almost anywhere in their 'area' so they can drift and find space and can playing a passing game and work chances (he had Jota there, he used Sawyers in a similar way and he seemed to push Watkins into a similar role). I think RHM and Green could do a good job in roles like that.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: oldhill_avfc on January 11, 2019, 05:25:20 PM
The problem with Green & RHM is that they're never fit for long enough.

Young injury prone players are rarely if ever worth persevering with.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on January 11, 2019, 05:35:25 PM
The problem with Green & RHM is that they're never fit for long enough.

Young injury prone players are rarely if ever worth persevering with.

Not sure that's fair, it really depends on what injuries they're getting. Green has, in my opinion, been incredibly unlucky with his, a lot like Delph was when he arrived. RHM is more of a concern but I'd hope that a lot of his problems will be addressed by getting more regular game time and building his match fitness. He seems to pick up a lot of niggles when he's had a period of not playing very much.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 11, 2019, 08:38:07 PM
I shall enjoy watching RHM.  To me he is yet another player we have not taken full advantage of.  Faced with walking ten minutes and watching RHM or driving most of a day through roadworks to watch BB, Hogan, Hourihane, Hutton and Elmohamady for me it is a no brainer.  As the years go by I become more interested in the players we don't use - RHM, Suliman, Green, Lyden, than the ones we do.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 11, 2019, 08:57:49 PM
Good man, Brian. I look forward to your reviews.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 11, 2019, 09:07:24 PM
Pleased to oblige eamonn.  It has a price of course.  The fans at the Abbey are small time twats and I could get into a fight every time I go there and the match experience is an exercise in bourgeois footyism.  £10 for fish and chips and a paper cup of weak coffee from a caravan inside the ground tells it all.  I normally shout for whoever they are playing.  They, of course know I sponsor Cambridge City so there is no love lost.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Risso on January 11, 2019, 09:10:06 PM
I'll pop along with you one weekend Brian.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: wittonwarrior on January 11, 2019, 09:11:09 PM
Never liked Cambridge from the time we played them in the FA Cup in 79. 
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 11, 2019, 09:38:01 PM
I very nearly had to suck it up big time with Cam U.  My younger son was in the county side and on the verge of being offered a youth place with them.  He got into Oxford so that was a bullet dodged.  My daughter, 45 years a Holte Ender and even more gobby than I am  is the Cambridge city councillor for the Abbey ward.  I am bomb proof.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on January 11, 2019, 10:09:45 PM
Calderwood takes RHM on loan.


https://twitter.com/AVFCOfficial/status/1083725480136753155

".@Rushcmpt has joined @CambridgeUtdFC on loan until the end of the season ✍️

Full story 👉 https://bit.ly/2Fqa5CE"
working with Calderwood is not a massive positive, but let's see.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on January 12, 2019, 07:44:03 AM
I'd imagined he might go to a div 1 team to be honest

Maybe he's not that highly rated by others. I do wonder how a striker of his physical stature is going to get on
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: john e on January 12, 2019, 08:56:47 AM
Never liked Cambridge from the time we played them in the FA Cup in 79. 


Let it go mate
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on January 12, 2019, 11:43:46 AM
Never liked Cambridge from the time we played them in the FA Cup in 79. 


Let it go mate

One of the joys of football is harbouring long standing unjustified grudges.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tayls_7 on January 12, 2019, 01:26:01 PM
Never liked Cambridge from the time we played them in the FA Cup in 79. 


Let it go mate

One of the joys of football is harbouring long standing unjustified grudges.

Ercall Colts U12s. I'll say no more.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LukeJames on January 12, 2019, 01:33:41 PM
Yeovil Town, fucked my BTTS bet three years ago, absolute livid.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 12, 2019, 01:34:33 PM
Is it okay to still think that Luton are a massive bunch of wanks?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 12, 2019, 01:45:51 PM
Is it okay to still think that Luton are a massive bunch of wanks?

As someone from Luton i'd hate to agree, but would have to agree.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Bad English on January 12, 2019, 04:35:16 PM
I have secretly hated Oldham for the past twenty-nine years.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on January 13, 2019, 07:12:08 PM
An absolute disgrace that Bruce wouldn't even find a place for RHM on the bench last Spring when he couldn't stop scoring goals, some of them quite brilliant.

What a waste of talent!!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 13, 2019, 07:20:27 PM
Kid was constantly injured.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on January 13, 2019, 08:05:46 PM
How did Hep do yesterday?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Holy Trinity on January 13, 2019, 08:11:02 PM
Played about 75 mins. Did pretty well considering he's not played much for us.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: wittonwarrior on January 13, 2019, 08:40:42 PM
Is it okay to still think that Luton are a massive bunch of wanks?

Yes without a shadow  of a doubt and okay to hate to  Milton Keynes Dons even  though there is zero history or links between the clubs.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Gareth on January 13, 2019, 09:05:48 PM
Is it okay to still think that Luton are a massive bunch of wanks?

Yes without a shadow  of a doubt and okay to hate to  Milton Keynes Dons even  though there is zero history or links between the clubs.

Other than the fact that Steve Stride was on the panel that let Wimbledon move to MK?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on January 15, 2019, 10:29:15 PM
Ah, but how did he vote?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 15, 2019, 10:34:54 PM
Ah, but how did he vote?

To let them move.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on January 16, 2019, 12:03:56 AM
Did he, Dave?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2019, 12:12:06 AM
Did he, Dave?

Sadly yes. He later said that the panel didn't get the full story and they'd been told that if they couldn't move Wimbledon would fold.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 16, 2019, 07:57:47 AM
Sorry.  Should have posted earlier RHM's debut got a so so reception in the local press.  Damned with faint praise.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 19, 2019, 02:47:10 PM
Rushian has the 9 shirt against Northampton today.  Calderwood being Calderwood has been doing a Houllier/Liverpool thing saying how much he loves the team Cam U are playing.  Just the thing to help the struggling club he manages.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 19, 2019, 04:43:06 PM
RHM subbed after 75m.  Played well, set up the equalizer.  Won the corner that got the second equalizer. Cam U fans love him.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 19, 2019, 04:46:09 PM
Nice to hear he's getting minutes and not getting injured.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 20, 2019, 09:49:53 AM
Cambridge Evening News.  "Rushian Hepburn Murphy created havoc across The Cobblers' back line".
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Clampy on January 20, 2019, 09:53:58 AM
I'd prefer to see him sitting on our bench to be honest but going out on loan and getting first team game time won't do him any harm either. Hope he does well and stays injury free.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on January 20, 2019, 09:59:20 AM
He did what he does best.  He harries the opposing defence. He is brilliant at boring in relentlessly.  Calderwood knows that and used him perfectly.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on January 21, 2019, 02:49:34 PM
A shame that Calderwood wasn't our manager instead of Bruce!

Please keep the reports coming in, Brian.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 14, 2019, 10:29:18 PM
Cambridge Evening News comments that Cambridge United's dramatic upturn in form coincides with the arrival of RHM.  Now playing with pace and energy they comment.  Wish I could read the same about the Villa.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on February 15, 2019, 12:28:16 AM
Surely he needs to be scoring some goals at that level?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on February 15, 2019, 12:24:38 PM
Surely he needs to be scoring some goals at that level?

Right now I'd be happy for him to play 10-15 games on the bounce to get his fitness. If he can stay fit the goals will come, he has natural talent but needs to get fully match fit to see if it's enough to make it.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Matt Collins on February 15, 2019, 05:46:46 PM
He does need to get a few. It's division 2. But let's judge that at the end of the season
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on February 15, 2019, 11:02:19 PM
He'll start with one or two tomorrow.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 16, 2019, 07:56:04 AM
He has hit the woodwork and won a penalty which was missed.  Not by him.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 16, 2019, 05:35:24 PM
Subbed after 62mins today.  Tired.  Played some lovely stuff my daughter tells me but he needs to toughen up.  Cam U happy with a point off a much higher team.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: rougegorge on February 19, 2019, 08:44:54 PM
Cambridge Evening News comments that Cambridge United's dramatic upturn in form coincides with the arrival of RHM.  Now playing with pace and energy they comment.  Wish I could read the same about the Villa.
Presumably you rate the Cambridge local paper more highly than the Birmingham one...on the subs bench tonight.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 19, 2019, 08:49:00 PM
Calderwood states that he is resting important players.  And I rate Health and Efficiency as a better football source than the Meaning Evil.  D-H in the starting side.  1-0 down to Cheltenham at half time.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: CT on February 19, 2019, 08:51:57 PM
Calderwood states that he is resting important players.  And I rate Health and Efficiency as a better football source than the Meaning Evil.  D-H in the starting side.  1-0 down to Cheltenham at half time.

I noticed he RHM was on the bench. They are both lucky boys to visit Whaddon Road, and I hope they both lose tonight!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 19, 2019, 09:22:02 PM
Rushian and Amoo both on at 65 mins.  RHM has point blank shot well saved on 75mins.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on February 19, 2019, 09:24:13 PM
DH has given away a penalty.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: rougegorge on February 19, 2019, 09:41:56 PM
Calderwood states that he is resting important players.  And I rate Health and Efficiency as a better football source than the Meaning Evil.  D-H in the starting side.  1-0 down to Cheltenham at half time.
Resting them for what? They are not clear of relegation.

He did get on, but to no avail.

I felt compelled to check out the quality of the Cambridge News.

"Hepburn-Murphy, for the third game in a row, has been denied by a point-blank save."
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 19, 2019, 09:51:53 PM
If you are going g to take the piss rougegorge I shall leave you to do your own research.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on February 19, 2019, 09:59:45 PM
It's a valid question. Cheltenham were below them in the league so he rested players so as they'd be fresh for a game against another team below them in the league. I'd be pretty pissed off about it if I supported them.

As for RHM he seems to be playing pretty well without getting goals or assists. Hopefully they'll start to come for him and D-H at that standard.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on February 19, 2019, 10:06:50 PM
It was the manner of the question not the question itself.  I simply,y took the time and trouble to pass on the gist of an interview with Calderwood in the Cambridge Evening News last week when he stated that key players would be rested.  You love to check things PWS  it is easy enough to prove.  I was simply reporting what Calderwood said not commenting on the veracity or justification of it.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on March 02, 2019, 05:57:01 PM
Came on on 65 mins at Grimsby. Got a card.  Got a goal.  Has his own song now.  "He used to play in claret and blue.  Murphy Murphy. But Colin said come and be a U.  Murphy. Murphy."  Delighted for the lad.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on March 02, 2019, 05:59:49 PM
https://twitter.com/ramsaymatt/status/1101885171954053120
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Toronto Villa on March 02, 2019, 06:03:22 PM
https://twitter.com/ramsaymatt/status/1101885171954053120

I still can't believe EA Sports in FIFA19 still hasn't addressed the keeper colour clash bug
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on March 02, 2019, 07:49:35 PM
Came on on 65 mins at Grimsby. Got a card.  Got a goal.  Has his own song now.  "He used to play in claret and blue.  Murphy Murphy. But Colin said come and be a U.  Murphy. Murphy."  Delighted for the lad.
so encouraging to hear this.
We really need some of the potential to step up next season and beyond.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on March 02, 2019, 08:15:45 PM
I was wondering if Jake D-H will get something similar "He used to wear claret and blue.  Doyley.  Doyley."*

*for the under 70s a doyley is a fancy piece of lace or paper for plates at posh tea parties.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: paul_e on March 02, 2019, 09:21:12 PM
https://twitter.com/ramsaymatt/status/1101885171954053120

Really good goal that. I've thought for a while that's his best position could be on the right of a 3 so he can make exactly those sort of runs off the fullback.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: KRS on March 02, 2019, 09:29:35 PM
Good lad. Can only improve his confidence. Keep it up.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SirSteveUK on March 03, 2019, 12:25:24 AM
https://twitter.com/ramsaymatt/status/1101885171954053120

Really good goal that. I've thought for a while that's his best position could be on the right of a 3 so he can make exactly those sort of runs off the fullback.
Thats where he usually plays for the U23
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Villa in Denmark on March 03, 2019, 01:16:57 PM
https://twitter.com/ramsaymatt/status/1101885171954053120

Took that very well.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Larry Duff on March 03, 2019, 03:33:48 PM
Well done to RHM.  He needs to work on certain aspects of his game (he can be a bit of a head down loan ranger sometimes) but, and this is quite important for a striker, He scores goals.
He is quick but is cool in the box.  Lots of pacy strikers snatch at chances, generally He doesn't.

Jake Doyle Hayes wasn't available because He has an ankle injury.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on March 03, 2019, 04:58:05 PM
Nice finish, hopefully he can rattle in another 10 of those in the run in.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Tuscans on August 02, 2019, 10:45:37 AM
Off to Tramere on loan.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Duncan Shaw on August 02, 2019, 10:56:47 AM
We must be confident of bringing in another forward player then with him and Green going out.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on August 02, 2019, 04:45:09 PM
I've still got high hopes for RHM, who should have been given far more game time in the Spring of 2018, when he was in red-hot form.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: garyshawsknee on August 02, 2019, 04:59:16 PM
Hope he can stay fit and get game time, really think this lad can have a future in the game.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on August 02, 2019, 05:20:24 PM
Me too.  When was the last time we had a loanee with his own song created by the fans of the club he was on loan to?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: LeeB on August 02, 2019, 06:15:27 PM
What I saw of him in the Walsall friendly, he looks like he's benefited from last seasons loan, so hopefully a full season at a decent club that are back on the up will serve him well again.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Border villan on August 02, 2019, 06:37:05 PM
Staying fit is vital for RHM. He looked a much better player in the friendlies.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: brian green on August 02, 2019, 06:58:55 PM
He does have injury issues.  Physically John McGinn he ain't.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on August 02, 2019, 07:06:55 PM
Tranmere? - not the school for development I'd have hoped.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Smirker on August 02, 2019, 08:03:41 PM
I don't think he's that good at all. Have never seen anything from him to suggest he will make it.

Would love to be proven wrong but I don't think so.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Richard on August 03, 2019, 10:01:02 AM
Playing in League 1 is an upgrade on Cambridge last season but his injury record is a concern.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Damo70 on August 03, 2019, 10:17:56 AM
Tranmere? - not the school for development I'd have hoped.

Tranmere have some momentum after back to back promotions so he should be walking into a club with a good positive atmosphere.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PaulWinch again on August 03, 2019, 10:57:59 AM
Good luck Rus.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on August 03, 2019, 04:59:26 PM
Sent off.  Oops.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Dazvillain on August 03, 2019, 05:00:05 PM
Just been sent off in last min of debut
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: PeterWithesShin on August 03, 2019, 05:01:16 PM
Violent conduct according to the Beeb.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: mr underhill on August 03, 2019, 05:12:03 PM
blimey - an inauspicious start for the boy.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Pete3206 on August 05, 2019, 12:04:03 AM
Just watched his red card. Idiotic.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dcdavecollett on August 06, 2019, 10:30:34 PM
Clutching at straws -he would never have been strong enough to have done that eighteen months ago!!
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on August 06, 2019, 10:37:33 PM
Yeah, the bloke he pushed over was twice his size.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: dave shelley on August 07, 2019, 09:17:15 AM
He'd have been out for a month with a strained shoulder.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on November 02, 2019, 04:41:01 PM
Our Hepburn has lift-off! A hat-trick with Tranmere away at MK Dons. Delighted for him. Now push-on, lad.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on November 02, 2019, 07:44:52 PM
Comments from his manager Micky Most Mellon:

Quote
And the boss was delighted with Hepburn-Murphy’s display as TRFC moved up to 18th in the division.

Mellon said: “We haven’t quite been able to give him his opportunity. We wanted to give other people a longer go at it, but we were able to do that today, and we have a striker scoring goals for us and he has come in and he has been terrific.

“He has deserved his opportunity, he has been great since he came here, and I’m really, really pleased for him that he took it.

“He is a great lad. We have been using him in wide areas, but we had to try and do something different, and he has gone and got a hat-trick, so full credit to him.”
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: SoccerHQ on November 02, 2019, 07:51:10 PM
Seems as ever he's had a few injuries but that is fantastic. Do we have recall option in January?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Virgil Caine on November 03, 2019, 08:55:56 AM
His goals versus MK Dons are well worth a watch- available on Sky Sports app. Really looks like the striker we thought he would be.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Mister E on November 03, 2019, 12:33:47 PM
His goals versus MK Dons are well worth a watch- available on Sky Sports app. Really looks like the striker we thought he would be.
Against 10 men, so there was space to exploit; but, he took them very well.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on November 03, 2019, 02:03:39 PM
The first one was against eleven and his manager has said above that he's been playing out of position thus far which may explain his lack of impact in the first couple of months. There is a real player there, I hope he pushes on now and gives Dean something to think about.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 31, 2020, 11:09:43 PM
Recalled and immediately loaned to Derby. Be interesting to see if he can get a game there. Be good if he could, and he might learn from playing alongside Rooney.
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2020, 11:11:16 PM
Rooney looked s different level tonight
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: Ian. on January 31, 2020, 11:24:12 PM
Rooney looked s different level tonight
‘Wolves’ type levels I presume?
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: FrankyH on April 08, 2020, 07:13:43 PM
Not as slick as the other clips footballers have posted....

https://www.instagram.com/p/B-uZVHgpSrD/?igshid=1u3sc18zyph85
Title: Re: RHM
Post by: eamonn on April 08, 2020, 09:05:05 PM
Oh dear...noticed that Mings and Tshibola replied in the comments.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal